NotAwfulTech

fucking awesome! here’s the process behind the music video for anyone who missed the video description:

Moving images on a computer! Looks primitive, is primitive, but damn it took a bunch of work to get that far.

This was partly produced on an Amiga 1000. The graphics were painted frame by frame in Deluxe Paint 2, which at that stage was limited to 320 by 200 pixels. My first edition Amiga was sold as a PAL machine but produced an NTSC signal. For both reasons all images had to be re-shot off the computer screen so you see scan lines.

To get the images to move I ran a UNIX style command line tool called LM (or Long Movie) that was on a Fish Disk. This would put a bunch of frames in memory (I had 512Kb) and loop them. So the motion was pretty much drawn blind and could only be a few seconds.

To get the graphics into the machine I HIRED a Digi-View which used a monochrome camera and a wheel with Red Green Blue filters. Each colour took a few seconds.The Amiga was fed into Stephen's vision mixer for things like luma keying and feedback effects. There's also a few minimal treatments with a Fairlight CVI for colouring and trails.

I am pleased with how minimal this gets. Lots of black and few colours.When we went to broadcast this the stations would complain about the sections with pure black which would set off systems for dealing with signal failure. They had to override the fail safes to get it on air.

Halfway through making this the Amiga broke down, and you can see some places which look 'circuit bent' without actually planning it. The computer was broken for about 7 months afterwards - it needed a new motherboard!

the Amiga was infamously very good at doing video effects on a budget — shows like Babylon 5 used a bunch of Amigas for editing, effects, and primitive 3D graphics. to be fair, as a budget toolchain the Amiga was also known for some of the cheesiest effects you know from microbudget 90s TV and VHS garbage. it was a flexible tool that could make art in the right hands (or a thoroughly awful infomercial in, ah, other hands)

Tom’s process is insane and I kind of want to try it! this was almost definitely the least expensive way to do computerized video effects, and a base level A1000 (that was the first Amiga, and he mentions it only had 512k of RAM) had so many constraints to work around! a lot of video production places automated the process of compositing the effects onto video using an expensive (to me, cheap to them) software/hardware toolchain called the Video Toaster, the software portion of which is now open source. I’ve actually been wondering if it’d be difficult to clone the Video Toaster hardware on an FPGA board, with maybe a USB interface instead of Zorro III so even the cheap (keyboard form factor) Amigas could play with one. all for the incredible power to edit and composite onto a low-res NTSC video stream!