this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
75 points (81.5% liked)

Memes

45228 readers
1294 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CHINESEBOTTROLL@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

countries in which the Dictatorship of the Proletariat failed to cede power to the working class and establish a socialist economic structure

Oh, so like every single other place that tried to implement that deranged system? Thank you for this very important distinction.

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's so very capitalist to look at failed attempts to escape capitalism which were sabotaged by capitalists as indication that the need to rebel is the problem.

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Failing to account for greed for power some people have is in itself a fatal flaw, to be honest. Anyone who advocates for the exact same actions and glorifies the USSR knows what they are doing, they're hoping to come out on top after their desired revolution. Unfortunately, there are plenty of those kinds of people on this platform...

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are Leftists advocating for the exact same actions as the USSR, or are Capitalists gaslighting the ignorant into believing they are?

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, I'm just saying tankie infestations are so widespread and loud that they have a decent amount of leverage on what the average person thinks of communism, and tankie opposing leftists are either not loud enough, or not numerous enough.

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Victim blaming.

[–] phobiac@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, how do you think governments in large capitalist economies (such as the US) properly account for greed for power and keep it in check? Do you think they are doing a good job on that front?

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Poorly, but not worse than a dictatorship(such as the USSR).

What's your point?

[–] phobiac@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You might want to turn that incredibly critical eye you've got for communism back in on capitalism, that's all.

[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I... am?

What is this, I am against dictatorial abominations, so that means I am in favor of capitalist abuse? I am literally saying that opposition to capitalism is shooting itself in the foot by tolerating the existence of authoritarian "communists".

Unless you're an actual tankie, your words towards me make no sense.

[–] phobiac@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Misunderstanding on my end then, I made some clearly unfair assumptions. I agree with you there and apologize for the mischaracterization.

[–] CHINESEBOTTROLL@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

failed attempts

They didn't fail. I mean you can criticize the ussr, but it was not capitalist

which were sabotaged by capitalists

What a weird thing to say. The USSR had sovereign control over the largest country in the world by far + a lot of allies. The capitalists can't even get rid of north Korea. Its not the capitalists, the system is just shit

the need to rebel is the problem

I mean its fine to rebel, but if your goal is communism I will bet on another case of "tHatS nOT rEaL coMMUnIsM"

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Communism doesn't include a hierarchy of power enforced by violence. The two concepts are antithetical. The USSR was somewhere between capitalism and fascism.

[–] SneakyThunder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you prevent people from trading and owning property without violence?

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Education. The reason that fascists are raising hell about wokeness is that Capitalism depends on ignorance.

[–] SneakyThunder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, can you "educate" me why I need to get rid of my private property?

And fascists practiced economic policies of "corporatism", not capitalism

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't have private property. You have personal property. https://allthedifferences.com/personal-vs-private-property-whats-the-difference/

Fascism and corporatism is just end stage capitalism. Every time capitalism fails it is bailed out by socialism or it devolves into genocide.

[–] SneakyThunder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The possession of personal property can’t earn you any money

If I understand it correctly my laptop and 3d printer, are private property since I can make money with those...

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No you can't. You have to create a legal entity before you're allowed to make money.

[–] SneakyThunder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure if thats required here, but it's totally possible without asking for government permission

Edit: i might be wrong here because of "legal speak" language barrier, but if I understand correctly you can make money from your business as a regular person just fine (legally). There's just a limit on how much you can earn before needing yo register as a business

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You can make exactly $600 per year off your personal property before you run afoul of tax laws in the USA.

[–] SneakyThunder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Thats sad(

There its ~25k$ IIRC. (Although doesn't count net profit, just all money you recive)

But there's huge gray market here, and I'm sure US has it too

[–] CHINESEBOTTROLL@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Communism doesn't include a hierarchy of power enforced by violence

Very convenient, since nothing will ever meet this standard, so you will be able to say "that's not communism" for the rest of your life. Actually sounds like the definition on anarcho capitalism

The two concepts are antithetical

Maybe to you, but many of the people in power at the time believed they were on the way to communism

USSR was somewhere between capitalism and fascism

I know of two common definitions of capitalism: "a system mostly organized around a profit-motive" and "a system in which individuals are mostly free to enter into consensual contracts". I don't see how the USSR is close to either of these. It was closer to fascism, tho there are also large differences

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Nothing will ever meet this standard" ~CHINESEBOTTROLL

If CHINESEBOTTROLL says it, then it must be true.

The two concepts are antithetical, even if the ignorant and corrupt claim it for themselves. Modern Christianity is antithetical to the Gospels of Christ, and that remains the case even as America slides into Christofascism. Fascists have always been steeped in irony because their core beliefs are based in the ignorance of ego.

You having an ignorant concept of capitalism doesn't have any bearing on reality, except that it causes you to ignore the atrocities of the system that keeps you fat and happy.

[–] CHINESEBOTTROLL@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the atrocities of the system that keeps you fat and happy.

You misunderstand. That is not capitalism but CRONY-capitalism. The two concepts are anrithetical. In REAL capitalism everyone respects the non-agression principle and therefore everyone is free. Crony capitalism is actually the LEAST capitalist system and is closer to socialism, because the government does stuff. I am very smart

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I didn't say that communism hasn't happened. It happens everywhere there's more than one person present, until it is stopped by a fascist who starts building a hierarchy, demanding that one person be in control and set the agenda. Fear is the fertile ground in which ignorance blossoms. The reason that all governments are based in fascism is because they all ultimately believe in their own authority to enact violence on individuals. When the ignorance INEVITABLY collapses into violence, communism rises from the ashes in the form of mutual aide, community, schools, and basic infrastructure.

[–] CHINESEBOTTROLL@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

communism rises from the ashes in the form of mutual aide, community, schools, and basic infrastructure.

This made me realize that you are not worth my time. I hope you have a nice life!

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about all these capitalist places that fell into fascism? What about the successful capitalist states that are currently falling into fascism?

[–] CHINESEBOTTROLL@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about them? The choices here are not "what we have now" vs "trust the people that want to try communism again"

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My point is about the flawed argument : "communism is bad because the attempts have failed". Well, there are more capitalist attempts that failed than communist ones, so the argument doesn't hold.

[–] CHINESEBOTTROLL@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My argument is not "look how many attempts have failed" but "look, of all of these many attempts, every single one has turned into a kafkaesque nightmare". At this point it is not even clear that "successful communism" is something that can exist in our world

On the other hand, while many (depending on your perspective you might even say most) capitalist systems fail, there are absolutely some that work ok. Of course nothing is perfect in the real world. But the life of say a danish person is not only materially well off, but also free and full of dignity, which was true of none of the experiments in communism

[–] bouh@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure many Chinese are well off, free and full of dignity.

It's also easier to be a successful country when you're not under ambargo just because you're not sold to capitalist companies. Did the US left even one communist country live normally?

But more importantly, how many successful capitalist countries, today, aren't going fascist at full speed?