Technology

60078 readers

3327 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

974

Bluesky sees record signups day after Musk says X will go paid-only (mashable.com)

submitted 1 year ago by geosoco@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

288 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just around 24 hours after Musk made his comments, more than 42,000 new users joined Bluesky, making it the biggest signup day yet for the currently invite-only platform that launched earlier this year.

Bluesky saw a total of 53,585 new signups by the end of Tuesday, September 19. The new users gained in that single day make up 5 percent of the platform's entire user base of 1,125,499 total accounts.

The new user signups are tracked via the third-party website "Bluesky Stats." Looking over Bluesky signup numbers on the tracker for the past month, it appears that the platform usually sees from 10,000 to 20,000 new signups per day. Bluesky has doubled its usual daily new user numbers already, with many more hours left in the day still to go.

It's impossible to know whether Musk's comments about charging users to post on X really played a role in this, but it almost certainly had some effect.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 13617@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh, but mastodon doesn't have a good algorithm like Twitter it is hard to switch

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The whole point of Mastodon not having an algorithm to show you things is to put the user in control of what kind of content they want to see.

Why do you need an algorithm to tell you what you are interested in? You go on Mastodon and subscribe to what you want to.

[–] topinambour_rex@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mastodon has algorythms. Otherwise it couldn't display the posts in the right orders, by example.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're right. That word has always been kind of dumbly used as a replacement for something like, "feed manipulation controlled by corporate interests". Every computer application uses algorithms in some way.

[–] 13617@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because it's hard to find things, the normal person is used to an algorithm

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I remeber Facebook before algorithms took over.

You friended and followed things, and then you'd see content from those things only in either chronological order or by recent activity. People loved it and as "the algorithm" took over people complained that they were no longer being served the content they wanted and expected and were also seeing content they did not want to see from stuff they had never followed or shared interest in.

Fuck the magical algorithm that's tailored to serve me divisive content because that is what drives the most engagement. Or serves me content to sway my political and moral opinions to the benefit of some wannabe oligarch or government entity (looking at you TikTok/CCP).