this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
1125 points (94.3% liked)

Political Memes

8501 readers
2836 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've seen lemmings both advocate for gun restrictions, then turn around and say we should use violence... I'm like: pick a side, you can't hold both opinions

[–] PlagueShip@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

knives don't make effective weapons...

are people gonna overthow tyranny by force with... knives?

[–] PlagueShip@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

People aren't going to overthrow our military by force, ever. Wake up. Our only chance is to change the system with reason. Or watch it burn, and try again next time people get a chance to create a government.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Restrictions doesn’t mean no guns. A guy that’s going to shoot schools shouldn’t have a gun, but a guy that’s going to shoot fascists should.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Background check are fine, but dems are getting too draconian.

Example:

The Sullivan Act

For handguns, the Sullivan Act qualifies as a may issue act, meaning the local police have discretion to issue a concealed carry license, as opposed to a shall issue act, in which state authorities must give a concealed handgun license to any person who satisfies specific criteria, often a background check and a safety class

So... cops have discretion on who to give permits to...

The. Fucking. Cops.

Sure thing. If your skin color is darker than hitler, no guns for you. If you are a progressive, or BLM protester, or anti-genocide protester, they will just use their discretion and be like: "No, gtfo".

Meanwhile, an alt-right white kid would have no trouble getting a gun their rural town where his dad knows the sherif.

Luckily, that law was stuck down: New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen

Oddly enough, this is a rare instance where I actually agree with the right wing shitheads in the court. (Although, the court probably had ulterier motives)

Tell me: how is giving cops discretion to deny your constitutional rights ever a good idea?

ACAB

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 minutes ago

I agree with you 100%

Things could be improved drastically. However, conflating gun control proposals with taking away all guns from everyone everywhere doesn’t help anything.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nah, when someone says they're against gun rights I prefer to at least give them the benefit of the doubt regarding ideological consistency and assume they're against all protests that involve violence and are happy when protestors can't defend themselves or deter against individual acts of state violence. I don't like to just assume that a stranger is a hypocrite or critically underdeveloped merely because I disagree with them. Believe a person when they tell you who they are.