this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
99 points (99.0% liked)

World News

22656 readers
63 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Edit: CW Don’t read if you don’t want descriptions of death of fish

Different ethical systems presume different things. That aside, I think the most universal thing is to minimise suffering. So it you’re going to fish, there are ways to minimise suffering of catch. It really depends your setup. But obviously the number one thing is do everything in your power to only catch things you will eat. Secondly, when you do catch something, don’t let it asyphixiate slowly to death. You can do a clean cut around the gill arches or the caudal artery. Which will hit the main veines and drop blood pressure to the brain really quick (very very quick death), this is also useful because then the fish bleeds out which prevents blood pooling in the meat from turning it rotten. Some people prefer to stun the fish before any cutting at all, so the first thing they will do, is hit something hard on the fish’s head which will immediately render it unconscious, then cut the arteries.

The whole asphyxiation to death is really the worst because it takes many many minutes and fish go through things like lungs collapsing and blood clotting which bring immense pain before being unconscious.

[–] maypull@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think the most universal thing is to minimise suffering.

that's just not true. the only ethical system i know of that holds this axiom is utilitarianism, and that is fraught with issues from epistemics to the fact it can be summarized "the ends justify the means"

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Stop abusing animals and do better. Eating animals is wrong, unhealthy and horrible for the environment. Stop making excuses for your nonsense.

[–] maypull@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Stop abusing animals

i don't, and your accusation is not appropriate.

[–] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

I think it's appropriate given your blase attitude towards the suffering non-human animals.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Yet you belittle the animals at every chance you get, someone wouldn't go through all the trouble of doing that if they didn't care about their image reflecting poorly to their peers. You do everything you can to hold yourself and humanity back rather than admit you're wrong and owe up to your mistakes. Such a poor character without substance. Drop the gaslighting and animal products now!