this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
470 points (98.4% liked)

politics

24133 readers
2838 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah so what? It's smoke it's not meant to harm, the smoke they fire at protestors is meant to harm and is actually more strictly controlled on the battlefield then the civilian policing world.

If they are wearing riot gear it's not meant to harm it's meant to say get the fuck out which is generally pretty easily discerned when they're chanting get the fuck out. Saying it's violence is what makes it a riot genius it's why of you support it you shouldn't die on this dumb hill.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

At this point, I just find this amusing.

If I spit on someone, it’s legally assault, so by the same token, throwing a smoke grenade at them also assault. Whether or not I, a random Lemmy user, consider this to be violence doesn’t make a damn difference to what Trump will do—he wants to murder everybody already.

But I guess if you want me to bow out and not die on this hill, then my answer is “yeah, whatever bro, I saw what I saw.”

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Cool.

If you spit on a cop or may or may not be depending on context and even then force has to be met with equal force. Try a dictionary then:

the use of physical force so as to injure, abuse, damage, or destroy

No you're too ignorant to know the difference and too obstinate to accept that your concept of violence may be skewed by capitalist interests.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lol, yeah, whatever bro, I saw what I saw.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No one is staying you didn't, im saying your definition of violence is contrary to both dictionary definition and legal understanding and only helps to validate authoritarian concerns.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Okie dokey. Should I stop responding so you can have the last word and feel satisfied?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You get that particular idiotic attempt at a dig goes equally well to you correct?

You seem to have responded specifically to get the last word, of you didn't want a response maybe don't respond?

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was asking if it would make you feel better. You seem to really want it, but then you respond with more questions.

At this point, I’m not trying to make any digs or prove anything—what’s the point, we will never agree anyway. I’m just munching my popcorn while you charge at windmills.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean you seem to really want it, you complain that I'm furthering conversation to have the last word and your solution is to continue the conversation yourself but solely to complain about it.

Tilting at windmills, you should really read the series because that quote doesn't mean what you seem to think it means.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Munch, munch, munch. Cool, man.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And then you double down, neat! I will advise you harassing me isn't the best choice but you do you.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So throwing a smoke bomb or rock at a person isn’t violence, but trolling you a little with popcorn noises is harassment. Aye aye, cap’n. You have me quaking in my boots over here.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

By definition no it's not violence and yes targeted continual contact against warning to cease is harassment.

Dictionaries and code books, read like one ever.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You haven’t told me to cease talking to you in this thread. Regardless, I’m bored with this, so adios muchacho. Sorry if I stepped on your toes too much.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

That's twice now.

Good, see ya. Stop trolling or at the very least be more effective.