this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
242 points (98.0% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

6859 readers
1548 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/31103164

Florida Republican says Cuban-refugee parents “are now just as American, if not more so, than Stephen Miller

A Republican state lawmaker in Florida who founded Latinas for Trump condemned the administration’s sweeping immigration arrests across the state despite the president’s months-long campaign that promised the largest “mass deportation operation” in American history.

“This is not what we voted for,” state Sen. Ileana Garcia said in a statement Saturday. “I have always supported Trump, through thick and thin. However, this is unacceptable and inhumane.”

She said her Cuban-refugee parents “are now just as American, if not more so, than Stephen Miller,” among the architects of Trump’s anti-immigration agenda demanding 3,000 daily immigration arrests.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 20 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

This has made me wonder if other states do what happens in California where they send out a fake ballot prior to the actual vote to show you how it works and explain all the stuff on it briefly so you can make a somewhat informed decision (though in reality a lot of shit is worded in legalese that was meant to be confusing which sucks). Because how the hell do you not know what it is you're voting for when it says so on the fucking ballot and the person you're voting for is blasted everywhere 24/7 telling you exactly what they plan to do? Literally sticking your head in the sand?

[–] Alue42@fedia.io 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I have lived in many states, including California. California has by far the best information pre-election to make informed decisions. Booklet with bios on every candidate, every issue, statements for and against, detailed descriptions about what a yes vote means and what a no vote means, sample ballot to make your decisions ahead of time - and this is just the info from the state/county/local municipality. All of this right to every voters' mailbox. Then there's the guides from the Union of Concerned Scientists, League of Women Voters, and a few others that might be more niche. In California at least, there's no excuse not to be an informed voter. After I moved away from California and only received my voting location in the mail, I called the election office to check to see if my sample ballot or booklet of bios or any other information was on the way or if it had gotten lost in the mail or something. They had no idea what I was talking about and were so confused. So I asked if I could get information about the candidates or the issues from the election website or something to inform myself about them. Nope! I had to find out who each candidate was and then look up if they had their own website to find out more about them and what they stood for - if they didn't have a website, that was it. For the issues, all I had to go on was the wording itself and what people were shouting about it in local media.

I wish all states would do what California does. But, I'm pretty sure that's partly by design - make it confusing and you can get people to vote for things they probably wouldn't want if they truly understood it.

Please don't use the phrase "fake ballots" though, especially in the current climate of people still thinking 2020 utilized fake ballots. The term you are looking for is "sample ballots".

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 8 hours ago

Please don't use the phrase "fake ballots" though, especially in the current climate of people still thinking 2020 utilized fake ballots. The term you are looking for is "sample ballots".

I was reaching for it I just didn't quite grab it. 😅

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago

In this case it's a state senator, whose full time job is to know about this shit, so... I don't think extra leaflets in the mail would have helped.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

Pennsylvania does not do this. Sounds like a handy tool, though.