this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9809 readers
695 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes but that's all lip service to Trump's wild claims of Canada and Mexico being hotbeds and the source of all drugs, criminals, dark skinned people, etc. To even acknowledge that clown's claims in their language is to let them set the agenda. Canada can and should do what it wants at its border but not with a fucking patriot act style national security giveaway.

Just remember, once it's there, it's there for any future admin. This was written for Trump and by industry lobbiests in CA who would benefit from decreased tarrifs and/or security/weapons/data companies that want far contracts.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hmm. I didn't read it like that. To me, since the source of many of our issues with drugs and guns come from the States, we need to protect our borders from Americans, not for Americans.

And since organized crime, and not "immigrants", are the problem, it seems like that's who we are addressing.

Sounds to me like Canada is doing what's best for Canada, not Trump. I guess we'll see how these new powers are put into effect.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Their point (well, part of it anyway) is that whatever the government says, there's no guarantee that the powers provided to the government by this bill will only be applied to organized crime, or that it'll stay that way. "America doing what's best for America" got them ICE.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We are better than that. At least, I hope and trust that we are.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hope and trust will only take you as far as your politicians are willing to play along. Trump happened to the United States, but demagogues with great aspirations and a willingness to bend rules to (and beyond) the breaking point are by no means unique to them.

Which is to say: make it legally binding instead of relying on the goodwill of politicians.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Trump happened to the United States

I would argue that Americans knew for decades that he was a piece of shit. Why they continued to vote for him is something for psychology professors to explain.

I hope that Canada never becomes that ignorant, and my worry for the future isn't really with our politicians, but more with our shifts as individuals.

Where I live, we've got a resurgence of violence towards visible minorities, and racist graffiti going up in public places (libraries, etc.). My concern is that a growing number of bad people will vote for bad politicians, not that good people will vote for bad politicians.