this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
88 points (83.8% liked)

Technology

72452 readers
2521 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

We coulda had an entirely wireless energy grid back in Tesla's day if it wasn't for capitalists who didn't see a way to profit from it.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it also would have very publically been a huge failure. Tesla tended to ignore the science when he didn't like it. It could not have possibly worked

[–] allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pretty sure I saw a movie where ol' Nick Tesla cloned Wolverine a bunch of times to fight Batman. If he was able to make clones back in the day I'm sure he could figure out a power grid issue.

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That wasn't the real Tesla, though. It was actually the Goblin King.

[–] allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Damnit! We've been fooled again by the Goblin King and his tight pants!

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
  • + Wireless

  • - limited range

  • - horribly inefficient, increasing with distance

So, there.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

tesla's idea was global wireless power. no idea what his efficiency numbers were though.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean you absolutely can communicate from Australia to USA with nothing but an old rusty bed frame and 5 watts of power. So there's that. But not much more to do with that bit of non-ionising power.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are you somehow under the impression that just because it is "global" there are no transmitters and receivers and distance does not matter?

[–] lime@feddit.nu -1 points 1 month ago

no. i don't pretend to even begin to understand how the prototype at wardenclyffe was supposed to work. i do remember that it supposedly used the atmosphere as a transmission line, but whether that meant bouncing the signal off of it (meaning it was radio based) or somehow charging it (meaning it was static based) i couldn't tell you.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

We, today, understand how to power something wirelessly. The problem is it's horribly inefficient.