this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
92 points (100.0% liked)

Quark's

1312 readers
3 users here now

Come to Quark’s, Quark’s is Fun!

General off-topic chat for the crew of startrek.website. Trek-adjacent discussions, other sci-fi television, navigating the Fediverse, server meta (within reason), selling expired cases of Yamok sauce, it’s all fair game.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Wikipedia didn't start out hallucinating. Also unlike LLMs, Wikipedia isn't being marketed as being capable of doing things it can't do.

It's not that good of a comparison.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Wikipedia started out as being extremely unreliable. So did Lycos, AltaVista, Yahoo, etc. Those things have matured over the 30+ years they’ve been around, but they didn’t start that way. The ability to research, confirm, and corroborate is an important part of life. It always has been and always will be.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

The first thing you learn when using Wikipedia is to use the sources and control F

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wikipedia did start having prank edits early on (and later malicious ones).

Didn't Stephen Colbert talk his fans into keeping certain content on a specific Wikipedia article at some point?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Even then, Colbert didn't realize the admins would just lock it.