Work Reform

9827 readers

1486 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

Higher wages for underpaid workers.
Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
Better and fewer working hours.
Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

seeCseas@lemmy.world

tintory@lemm.ee

TinMod@lemmy.world

987

Bosses and workers still can’t agree on whether the commute is part of the work day, and it’s creating a $578 billion productivity problem (fortune.com)

submitted 1 year ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world

318 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] psud@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Otherwise you would get weird situations where people could apply to distant jobs and the employer having to pay those costs and hours. Get a job with a 2 hour one-way commute and you would then only need to work 4 hours... obviously not going to work.

The obvious solution is to limit it to the historically normal commute time (30 mins to 1hr each way)

You can choose to live 4 hours away, but the organisation only pays for x hours

I think the minimum commute time available to a young family person in my town now is 45 mins, so that would be an obvious limit here