this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
1534 points (97.5% liked)

Selfhosted

46648 readers
420 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Text:

I consent to Plex to: (i) sell certain personal information (hashed emails, advertising identifiers) to third-parties for advertising and marketing purposes; and (ii) store and/or access certain personal information (advertising identifiers, IP address, content being watched) on my device(s) and share that information with Plex’s advertising partners. This data is used to deliver personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Your consent applies to all devices on which you have Plex installed. You can withdraw your consent at any time in Account Settings or using this page.

Soure: https://www.plex.tv/vendors/ (Might have to clear cache)

Can also read about the changes here: https://www.plex.tv/about/privacy-legal/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rfr_Foglia@feddit.it 50 points 4 days ago (39 children)

Can someone clue me in on the reason why anyone would prefer Plex instead of Jellyfin?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 57 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There are a LOT of pros and cons.

Pros:

  • Developed by a professional, multi-disciplined full-time team with some security oversight.
  • Hosted caching of The Movie DB for faster lookups
  • Provision of SSL communication to and from your server without any special setup
  • FREE EPG data caching
  • Centralized server management from the web
  • Low-speed relay for those stuck behind CGNAT.
  • A REALLY solid mobile audio*** player (sorry, but plexamp beats the pants off the JF alternatives)
  • Centralized Login for your friends and family with email-based password reset
  • 2FA already set up
  • A nice reflector gauge to see if your* ports are open and what your limits are
  • Great client support on a LOT of devices
  • Search is fast out of the box, even with extensive collections
  • Their clients tend to do a better job supporting all the decoding features on every player
  • Very reasonable Tuner support (but somewhat ugly) **

Cons:

  • Not free
  • Not Open
  • They have a lot of your historical data and will eventually sell it when they sell the company. This is not going to be optional. That data is worth a lot and they likely already have enough EULA rights to sell it to whoever asks. Imagine if the MPAA gets in on the fun.
  • Their security history is quite dicey
  • The lifetime membership will eventually be enshitified as it's not economically sound in the long run
  • They constantly change the terms of the agreement.
  • They constantly remove features people are using
  • They constantly push to share data between users
  • They constantly push Ads
  • They are making previously free features pay.
  • Their investors are starving, which makes them a liability.
  • Their clients are generally slower.

edit: * a word ** forgot to shout out for the tuner support *** replaced media with audio for clarity

[–] Muffi@programming.dev 16 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I am a die-hard Jellyfin user, but I still haven't found a proper way to index and stream my music library with it. As far as i know, Plex is still better at that.

[–] Psychonaut1969@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Navidrome and Airsonic advanced provide a better music experience than jellyfin for me anyway and both are free.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I dropped my library in, Jellyfin indexed it and streamed first try. What didn't work for you?

[–] SupremeDonut@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not the user you replied to, but for me, the issue I've been running into is with featured albums or albums with album artist metadata info filled out {image}.

Its been a minute so I dont have the specific cause I was focused on. This problem was more prevalent in EDM tracks

https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/5fa246a8-22bc-4bfc-90f5-d9ff04b768a8.jpeg

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I don't think jellyfin does any tagging for you. Pretty sure you can edit it, but it's not automatic. I use lidarr and mp3tag for that. Maybe musicbrainz picard on a rare occasion, if I've got a bunch of files that need to be identified first.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

Not OP, I've kinda had a middle of the road experience with it.

I run JF and Plex on the same shares.

I dropped 10k tracks on it and a bunch of audiobooks, my stuff is 100% tagged.

I use tailscale to get to the server because here's no Nat Holepunching going on.

I try to use it as much possible for audio, but some days, I just give in and use plexamp (like a guilty pleasure)

cons:

  • It has issues with displaying some of the songs, they're tagged right but you just can't find some of it. They're all Discogs coded, so there's not even a lot of extra characters.
  • It doesn't always remember where in a book I am,
  • It has no idea about collections of book files.
  • Search is very slow, (yes there is a plugin for this, yes it's complicated enough I haven't tried it yet)
  • Scrolling a large list is stupid low, it should just stream everything text into ram and bring thumbs in on demand
  • Finamp: Finamp is barely a wrapper for the JF engine to the point that they can't implement effects or crossfade without the feature being added in JF first. But JF is just using a ready-to-go library to play music, so changes to JF require upstream library updates. Audio development feels stagnant.
  • Finamp scrolling loads one letter at a time. Scroll to Z? you get to wait, A....B...C...D...E...F...G...H...I...J...K...L...M...N...O...P...Q...R...T...U...V...W...X...Y...Z, no skipsies. It literally takes me a couple of minutes to go to songs that start with Z.
  • Plugin installs are complicated and poorly documented, and compatibility with versions is dicey
  • Finamp: If you lose the network in the middle of a song, you can soft-lock the app.
  • Finamp: occasionally crashes if left for a long play session on my late-model Android phone.
  • No options to cast.
  • No listening through a NAT without port forwarding (which is dicey without a security team)
  • No 2FA
  • Finamp?: Shuffle is too random, you can get the same song to play twice in a couple of minutes. it needs to pull at least a couple of hours of list and shuffle that, rather than random play.

pros:

  • It's free
  • It works good enough-ish for a daily car ride.
  • It has some form of limited home-grown fail2ban
  • The developers are super nice people.
  • I exported my Plex playlists and used some Python to turn them into m3u lists, which worked fine. (Would be a cool feature to import from Plex)
  • Playlist and Shuffle work mostly fine.
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RyeBread@feddit.org 2 points 4 days ago

I've recently had really good luck with Finamp on Android at least. With the recent support of time lyrics in Jellyfin and Finamp's redesign I've been using that to stream my Flac audio files. Works quite well with separate collections as well. Though, to this day I still have to force close it more times than I like to get the UI to refresh after closing it. Plexamp was tough to lose when I swapped many years ago, but the third party space has slowly been closing that gap over the years.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think it mostly comes down to sharing stuff with others.

There's a lot of stuff in Jellyfin you wouldn't want to expose to the internet.

No idea if Jellyfin even has a client for my dad's shonky old 4K TV, but I certainly wouldn't be able to set up Wireguard or anything on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rothaine@lemm.ee 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Years ago, I tried out Jellyfin (Emby at the time) and it couldn't do chromecasting with subtitles (probably fixed by now, this was a long time ago). Since I wanted to watch anime, I bought a Plex lifetime subscription instead, and I'm too lazy to switch.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 4 days ago

It is a matter of time before they will get to you

I am in the same boat but jellyfin ain't there yet for my use case

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

It can Chromecast these days

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 days ago

People commonly cite more polished clients and clients available on obscure platforms like legacy smart TVs and such

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] rfr_Foglia@feddit.it 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What is wrong with Jellyfin's TV app? I use it on my Android TV and I don't have any problems

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Not available for my Samsung or the kid's Visio TVs

[–] Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago (6 children)

The lack of a PS5 app makes Jellyfin useless to me. We have a dumb TV with no casting ability so the PlayStation is out media box.

[–] spicehoarder@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

Have you even tried the web UI?

load more comments (5 replies)

End user management.

Essentially, accounts and passwords are not my problem.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

They're going to sell the data to movie companies so they can find out what is being pirated

I fuckin guarantee it.

Trakt did the same thing I bet

[–] 3abas@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's not hard to find out what's being pirated, BitTorrent isn't private.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ginopilotino@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago

It just works and has a native app for basically everything.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sunk cost. It took me loosing my Plex watch history to say fuck it I'm going to Jellyfin.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

I saw several solutions on Github that could migrate it.
Assuming you use/-d trakt you could use that to re-import the watch history

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Because Plex used to be good but new it's just pure enshitification.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago

User sharing without opening my Plex server to the public internet. For Jellyfin I would have to become a VPN provider and allow people into my private network to share it safely, since you wouldn't want to have Jellyfin available to the internet with their stance on security

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Because Jellyfin et al are all still very much "open source projects" in terms of UI/UX and it is still "missing" so many features.

For me? The big reasons why I just use plex boil down to:

  1. Maybe 80% of the time, I can cache an episode or a movie locally on my tablet when I am going on travel. This is great if I am doing a rewatch of something or don't super care about The Experience and just want to watch the next few episodes of a show in the evening. With Plex, this is trivial. With SOME of the third party jellyfin apps, this can be sort of worked around but then becomes a hassle to sync watch statistics (which episodes were watched or even where I left off because a buddy wanted to go out for drinks).
  2. Remote watching is similarly a mess. Plex has pretty okay-good systems to treat my home server as a "cloud" resource with a single forwarded port. While even that is very questionable security wise, Jellyfin is still "figure it out yourself". Which can be done with setting up a vpn or using Tailscale but adds additional complexities.
  3. Plenty of other "quirks" along similar lines

My personal opinion? For something that only "tech savvy" people are using more or less locally, Jellyfin is fine. For something that "just works"? There is no competition with Plex. And considering how many of the Jellyfin workarounds end up being "just download a copy of the file locally and watch it in VLC"... why would I use Jellyfin at all in that case when I could otherwise just mount a samba share or use Kodi (that is the latest incarnation of XBMC or whatever the samba share frontend we all used to watch porn on our playstations was, right?).


To be clear. I check in on Jellyfin probably every other year at this point? I WANT an alternative to Plex. But... Jellyfin ain't it.

[–] ginopilotino@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

I feel exactly the same as you, but i'd like to add a number 4 point: Plex has an offical app for every system/SO

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I’ve been a Plex user. Honestly it was mostly because I chose Plex years ago before a lot of the recent controversy. Plex always seemed like it had a nicer interface, though I never really gave Jellyfin a try. As of late, Plex has started to add a lot of bloat to their interface, so at this point Jellyfin’s UI might actually be a pro.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I've tried Jellyfin and the Live TV / tuner interface sucked so bad I didn't want to bother with it any further. Maybe I could have found plugins or some shit to make it more usable but I've had a lifetime Plex pass for almost a decade and it still works great

Yes, they've made a number of decisions that truly suck in that time but it's still better than the experience I had with Jellyfin or Emby, even recently.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)