this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
908 points (98.1% liked)

Greentext

6326 readers
1580 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 34 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Some of y'all have never been addicted to anything and it shows.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

No one is questioning why addicted people keep smoking. We're questioning why non-addicted people start smoking.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Yeah you say that like it's a character flaw.

"You're worthless suckers have no vices"

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 24 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'm saying that the person in the green text is judging people for going through something they have literally no experience with.

Obviously addiction is bad, but that doesn't mean the people who become addicted are stupid or make bad decisions. The way addiction works means there is no choice. If it was as simple as making a choice addiction wouldn't exists.

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think the issue they're having is why are there still young people that smoke, regardless of income, demographic, race, area, every category has some amount of young people smoking. You can't explain them ALL away by lack of education, unideal upbringing, etc etc.

My mum always said when I was growing up she believes no one will smoke soon since we have so much education on it in school. Yet I'm 37 and teens are still starting smoking. I live in what is considered a fairly rich and well educated area. They're not addicted before they start. They do have a choice. It is as simple as making the choice not to start. They're not in a situation that they don't know better.

We shouldn't have as many people under 40, under 30, under 20 smoking as we do.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

They're not in a situation that they don't know better.

I would like to draw your attention to this truckload of stupid shit teenagers have done despite knowing better. Let's not underestimate the capacity of the developing mind in making bad decisions despite having all information necessary to evaluate exactly how bad the decisions are.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Thats nonsense. If there was no choice noone would ever quit anything. People need to acknowledge that bad choices got them into the addiction so they can recognize and avoid triggers while sober. Doesnt mean someone's a bad person, we all make mistakes daily, some bigger than others.

You are right its not as simple as making a choice, but one can't recover from an addiction without personally choosing to do so. Its essential to the process and generalizing all addicts as helpless doesnt serve anyone.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Actually, addicts chose to be addicted when they chose to ingest addictive drugs before they were addicted. Hope this helps ♥

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Absolute statement like that coming from an obvious place of smug ignorance is always entertaining.

I look forward to your debate with others in this thread.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 0 points 3 days ago

Wow, the world is so black and white! No nuance or context at all, you can just call everything like you see it. You're so smart for being able to see the world one dimensionally. Thanks for the help 🙏

You must be a trump voter.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

“You’re worthless suckers have no vices”

Vices are social taboos, not iron laws. And if you haven't ever transgressed, I gotta wonder what kind of life you're living (particularly in a society that's puritanical in its ethics)

[–] echodot@feddit.uk -5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

So unless you commit a crime of some kind you are not a real person? I don't understand what arguement you're trying to make

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This MF'ER so scared, they ain't never even jaywalked 🤣

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

Jaywalking isn't actually a crime anywhere other than the United States so no I've never jaywalked.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

You sound like you would actually benefit from drugs lol

Loosen up ffs

I commit crimes on a daily basis. I'm skeptical of people who follow all laws without thinking. Do you really never speed while driving or jaywalk?