this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
853 points (99.5% liked)

politics

23674 readers
2985 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He huffed about how the question wasn't "appropriate" even though his bill would result in kids being asked that same question.

A Republican state rep from Michigan testifying about his anti-trans sports bill on Monday was left speechless after an out Democratic colleague began his questioning by asking, “Representative, can you tell me: are you trans?”

A long beat staring down out gay Democratic state Rep. Mike McFall followed, before state Rep. Jason Woolford (R) managed to reply, “Are you?”

“I’m actually going somewhere with this,” he said to lawmakers in the small chamber.

“Because I want to know, how does a 14-year-old girl prove whether or not she’s trans to a 50-year-old coach?”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Colalextrast@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Human beings are sexually dimorphic, but most of the advantages or disadvantages are negligible or can be overcome with training, so it makes little difference. It makes even less difference in middle and high school aged children, since everyone is at (somewhat) different points developmentally anyway.

[–] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also sports were never fair to begin with, they are literally competitions of ableism

[–] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Maybe but that doesn't mean we shouldn't attempt to make them as fair as possible.

[–] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I disagree, especially if it means auditing childrens genetalia to vindicate a chud.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Exactly, we're talking about two different things when comparing children's sports and Olympic sports and it's easy to conflate the two.

Olympic competition needs fair rules to ensure the best humanity can produce is rewarded. The rules are already there and they seem to be fair and supported by trans athletes. Politicians need to stay out.

In children's sports it's more important kids learn skills, fitness, cooperation, and find a sense of community. So unless there is a massive outlier, the rules should maximise inclusion over "fairness". Politicians also need to stay out.

[–] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I agree. I feel like this is only made more complicated because of college sports and the money involved.

[–] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Imma keep it a buck fifty, I don't give a chicken fried fuck about fairness in any sport. Let them juice, drug, dope whatever, if they can do it then just document the conditions under which they achieved their times,reps, whatever.

This whole thing is just a fools errand to give chuds a foothold to deny transcare and further trans erasure.

[–] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think you're being a little dramatic. I understand if you personally don't care about the rules but I have to imagine no one is saying it should just be an absolute free for all. Again I don't understand why we link school and sports but we do and for that reason it means a lot to some and nothing to others. I'm completely down for a free for all in professional sports.

[–] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Im not being dramatic, sports just are inherently unfair, any attempt to moderate that just shifts the window for the optimal body type to play that sport.

If your 6'5" and im 5', and were playing basketball how do you make that fair? You don't.

"Oh but you could be faster or someshit" Yea that's why we have an abundance of height differences in the nba because you can work around that obvious genetic advantage.

[–] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I agree with what you're saying but I also don't think it has to come to that. I guess my point is that if we don't make some attempt to set a standard then we are allowing literally anything. I don't honestly care for sports being tied to school in the first place but are we saying that anyone can claim to be trans and join the other team at any time because we're all too afraid to talk about it or what? If that's the case then it seems like we should just do a way with gender in sports completely.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

I guess my point is that if we don’t make some attempt to set a standard then we are allowing literally anything.

You have a standard. Men play in the men's category, women in the women's. In this context, a man is anyone with a testosterone-dominant biology, and a woman anyone with an estrogen-dominated biology. There is your objective standard.

[–] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

What if a person feels like a girl and then later a boy but the later decides that they really felt most like themselves as a girl and would like to be a woman now?

Why the fuck should anyone else be involved in that discussion? For that sake of fairness in sportsball? Give me a break.

Sure just do coed sports whatever I don't care.

The whole thing is based on a false premise, that sports were ever fair to begin with.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If sports were as fair as possible, every sport would have handicaps built into it. Ensuring sports are as fair as possible is only ever brought up when new minority groups want to participate in sports they were previously excluded from.

[–] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

So in college sports the performance gap is larger and should be considered or no? I also find this hard to believe even at a highschool level. While I was in highschool the advantages of testosterone were very obvious. If it were really the case that it makes little to no difference then shouldn't the argument be to remove gender from sports all together?

[–] healthetank@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

negligible or can be overcome with training

I agree on a highscool/grade school level, but not at any extreme competitive level. There's a reason most of the world records for athletics are held by men.

Testosterone doesn't make all men better than all women, but if you take two equally trained+talented people for most athletic events, the men outperform the women.