this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
135 points (98.6% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2605 readers
901 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deathmetal27@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I find it fascinating that, unlike today, where every religion thinks that their own gods exist and others don't, the Romans believed that all other gods existed alongside their own.

When the Romans were conquering Britannia, they were attacking a small river island. There they encountered a group of Druids. As the Romans cut them down they realized that the Druids were actually sacrificing themselves at their hands in some unknown ritual. The Romans saw this as a bad omen since they had just inadvertently participated in some foreign god's ritual. Shortly afterwards, Boudicca started her campaign against the Romans.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Another fascinating facet is that the Romans took a certain aspect of Greek theology and ran with it full speed. Under the Interpretatio Graeca, all gods were actually the same gods - more or less. The Greek god of war was the German god of war - just worshipped under different names, seen in different clothes, with some different stories passed down. They were still, ultimately, the same god; and thus, all the world shared in a common faith.

The Interpretatio Romana is the exact same thing, just as applied to Roman religion instead of Greek religion. As the Romans came into contact with Greek culture, and shamelessly stole the bits they liked, they applied this theology to the world they conquered. Everyone's gods are everyone's gods.

While occasionally the Romans would import a foreign cult, even then they often equated that foreign cult with an established god in addition (something which later Graeco-Roman Platonism would use to espouse the view that all gods are emanations of the same, singular divinity). You get a lot of Roman religious epithets from this - the Romans liked addressing their gods with specific relevant titles or sub-names, like Mars Silvanus, Mars of the Woods, or Mars Ultor, Mars the Avenger, when calling upon gods. This becomes relevant in Interpretatio - Romans and provincials would worship the same god under the same name, by using these dual-names - such as Mars Lenus - 'Mars who is also Lenus (a Celtic god of war)'.

Goes a long way towards defusing concerns that the foreign conquerors are godless heathens - or that the conquered provincials are dirty superstitious savages. Whatever the mutual recriminations leveled between each other, they could at least be assured that the outsiders weren't risking the wrath of the gods with their strange, foreign ways - after all, they're paying respect to our gods!

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The Roman baths in Bath, England, are dedicated to the goddess Sulis Minerva. I imagine it went something like...

Romans: What have you got here?

Brits: Springs that are blessed by our goddess.

R: Which goddess is that?

B: Sulis, the goddess of wisdom.

R: Ah, we know her! Back in Rome she's Minerva. Henceforth these shall be the springs of Sulis Minerva.

B: But these are the springs of Sulis!

R: Yes, and they still will be, but they will be the springs of Sulis Minerva, because otherwise we would have to kill everyone.

B: Sulis Minerva it is!

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Interpretatio ~~Graeca~~ Romana

So good at stealing things, they even stole the idea that stolen things weren't stolen!

"See? You stole it from those guys!"

"Steal? We would never! It's simply been incorporated into our society."

[–] deathmetal27@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wonder what they'd do when encountering a god that has no equivalent in the Roman pantheon. Do they then invent a new equivalent god?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

While the Romans were not averse to inventing new gods, more often they just really stretched the interpretation of foreign gods to fit - like interpreting the Germanic Wodan (Odin), the one-eyed god of wisdom and war, as their equivalent of Mercury, the god of trade and travel (they're both wandering gods, it MUST be so!).

Other times, they'd just adopt the new god wholesale and assign it a suitably Roman name, like Magna Mater for Cybele, an Anatolian goddess.