this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
470 points (98.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

23606 readers
1526 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Please don't lob rocks at me. I love Python.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It sure made sense forty years ago. And I'd bet that the examples in that book are more AI than today's LLMs.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The dominant approach at the time were Expert Systems. This used a lot of carefully crafted data and manually curated facts that the inference engine can use. It also fit in a MUCH smaller footprint compared to conventional neural networks. But you also don't get real language processing, reasoning beyond the target problem domain, and stuff like that - it's laser focused and built on very small amounts of data. Much of the research from back then centers on using Lisp and Prolog of all things, so BASIC isn't a big stretch.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Prolog is even better suited for such applications.

[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

who tf even uses prolog anymore (said the one still using old basic, from when it still had line numbers and everything was goto all the way down)

this is very clearly a self deprecating joke btw