dosuser123456

holding his dads old pc xt did anyone call me?

anyone else recognized the os just from that text editor?

ui is clearly edit.com, therefore must be dos. most likely 5.0 or 6.22

windows xp kernel included dirty hacks from when ms-dos 6.22 was in active development and not released yet and they might still be there in 10

insert low quality jpeg of a yellow blob unidentifiable to compression artifacts here

then i must be the pastafari /j

xd

great, now the compiler wont let me modify my programs (i really should get better at coding because i seem to only know to do spaghetti)

tbh nor am i, this is becoming vim vs emacs 2.0 isnt it

thats exactly what the "you get the idea" line meant, i was only giving some examples because if i did itd be literally every language

(also modern c is spaghetti, but old c is even more. legacy code is spaghetti no matter the language)

You should see some of my code. On second thought, it’s probably best you don’t.

thats the same warning i give to anyone looking at ~/scripts. particularly ~/scripts/bas, ~/scripts/js and ~/scripts/bat_bkp (which is copy of /mnt/msdos/jp/batch)

all code in those folders is like that

well, in my country (spain) assembler and assembly are basically used interchangeably, so i do that a lot. will take into account for future posts tho.

i mean old c

legacy cide is always pasta