this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
574 points (97.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2861 readers
1025 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The DNC cited a procedural concern, but Hogg said it is “impossible to ignore the broader context” of his criticisms.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] btaf45@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I’m speaking of a socialist revolution. Not a fascist takeover.

So a Communist takeover. Not much difference in that and a fascist takeover.

“Revolutions” serve people.

Then how come the Russian revolution and the Iranian revolution and the Chinese revolution all killed millions of people much of whom were selected randomly? Why would an unaccountable government that doesn't allow people to chose their own leaders be more likely rather than far less likely to "serve people"