this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
574 points (97.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2861 readers
946 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The DNC cited a procedural concern, but Hogg said it is “impossible to ignore the broader context” of his criticisms.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I really like the idea of a tea party style takeover. That seems much more actionable and realistic.

[–] Gismonda@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I’m going to assign you a book:

Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals by Saul Alinsky

Do you remember when the right-wing dummies were all shrieking about this book, and how Hillary Clinton was mentored by Alinsky?

It’s because they were following the damn advice in that book - it’s like a checklist of what to do to take over locally, then statewide, etc

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No such thing.

The tea party was just billionaires covered in AstroTurf. They bought the Republican party. It's asymmetrical warfare, because the left doesn't have billionaires that profit from our policy goals.

Not to be a doomer, I do think Democrats can be pulled left (kicking and screaming) but I'm not sure how though.

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 11 points 2 days ago

Tea party was partially real. But it was basically petite bourgeois: car dealership owners and the like. This was also the main component of Jan 6th. These people aren't a huge constituency but there are a lot more of them than billionaires.