this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1858 readers
735 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gerikson@awful.systems 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

LWer suggests people who believe in AI doom make more efforts to become (internet) famous. Apparently not bombing on Lex Fridman's snoozecast, like Yud did, is the baseline.

The community awards the post one measly net karma point, and the lone commenter scoffs at the idea of trying to convince the low-IQ masses to the cause. In their defense, Vanguardism has been tried before with some success.

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/qcKcWEosghwXMLAx9/doomers-should-try-much-harder-to-get-famous

[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

There are only so many Rogans and Fridmans

The dumbest motherfuckers imaginable, you mean? There are lots of then

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 3 points 4 hours ago

As a famous swindler once said, there's a sucker born every minute.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

For the purpose of this post, “getting famous” means “building a large, general (primarily online) audience of people who agree with/support you”.

Finally a usage for those AI bots. Silo LW, bot audience it, and problem solved

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 2 points 5 hours ago

And that solves the financial problem lf the issue. Buckle up people sneering is about to be monetized.

[–] scruiser@awful.systems 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Eliezer Yudkowsky, Geoffrey Hinton, Paul Cristiano, Ilya Sustkever

One of those names is not like the others.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 6 points 6 hours ago

What do you mean? I think they all went to highschool.