this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
540 points (99.6% liked)

politics

23377 readers
3390 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A recent deal between an Emirati investment firm and a cryptocurrency company tied to the Trumps could endanger national security, Warren said.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren is urging a federal watchdog to investigate a recently announced deal between a Trump-backed cryptocurrency company and an investment firm tied to the government of the United Arab Emirates.

Warren and Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon sent a letter to Jamieson Greer, acting director of the U.S. Office of Government Ethics, on Monday outlining their concerns.

The deal in question concerns the Emirati investment firm MGX, the crypto exchange Binance, and World Liberty Financial, a crypto company that lists President Trump and his sons as members of its team.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

NO FUCKING WORKING CLASS PERSON IS GIVING $5000 TO ANY POLITICAL CAMPAIGN

Dude 5k is absolutely within reach of many working class retirees, especially widows. They do give that much and more. But that’s not the point.

Those old widows aren’t working, and probably never did.

Working class has never meant currently working, or even formerly working. But that’s not the point.

Now they just sit around taking up space, driving up house prices

Is this a “useless eater” argument? A person’s ability is not what gives them the right to not be murdered. But even that is not the point.

Selling out their children’s future to the next dipshit conman that comes along.

Is this defending generational wealth inheritance? Because that’s part of how we got here. At least be consistent. But that is not the point.

People who have 5k to piss away aren’t working for that money

Again many working class retirees have some combination of retirement savings, pension, SSI, SSDI, insurance and LTC vehicles, etc, that can put 5k of liquid assets within reach, even if it costs them dearly. But that’s not the point.

You start from the top down until you get the changes you want.

Only for the true global elite would top-down be a sound strategy, and again the elites won’t be on your list because they give differently. And it’s only sound because it associates wealth itself with risk, directly counteracting their incentive for further oppression/profit. But that’s not the point.

The point: if you murder people for the way they vote, or even threaten to do so, you become a fascist yourself.

This isn’t how we win. Get your ass into therapy before hate consumes you.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

We can argue more about whose approach is correct when we meet in the concentration camps.

To call someone who worked 30 years and retired in their 50's with a full pension, 401k, and full government benefits all the while supporting a partner and family, 'working class' is incredibly disingenuous. That's called upper middle class now, to have one adult work, and afford a home and raise children.

Just because they used to be 'working class' doesn't mean they are now

Some white privilege gamgam that got knocked up 60 years ago and has been riding that accomplishment ever since, giving money her dead husband earned to a fucking traitor is something that should not go unpunished.

2016, fine your of the hook. 2020? You're fucking organic waste, but fine, you get a pass. But if you gave that money, in 2024, after all he had already said and done, then you're gonna fucking pay for your choice. If anything, your kids know how you voted, and ultimately we'll be the ones that determine how you spend your last days on this earth, when you get water, pain meds, how long you sit in your own filth, and when the plug is pulled.

The elderly shouldn't be in the practice of building houses that they'll never live in. They've had their time, it was a complete fucking catastrophe. If they had bowed out gracefully there wouldn't be a need for them to bow down before the beheading.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 1 points 2 hours ago

Donald — He asks that you now call him that — thanks you for your continued service, for the outstandingly explicit misogyny, ageism, chauvinism, victim blaming, eugenicist contempt, uncontrollable seething hatred and mommy issues you have now publicly expressed in your rampage against His victims.

It’s people like you doing the greatest work to shape social discourse in His Image, to sow hatred and discord, to further galvanize His voter base, and to fracture that of His enemies who trusted you.

He wishes to convey that your thirst for the blood of your weakest countrymen, your betrayal of democratic values and esprit de corps, and your abandonment of any sense of justice or morality in service of His Vision has not gone unnoticed. Even He finds it delightfully grotesque.

We all expect great things from your campaign of terror against the working class. Keep up the good work.