373
Why do websites still include those buttons to share articles in 2025? does anyone even still use them?
(reddthat.com)
this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
373 points (98.4% liked)
Ask Lemmy
31199 readers
1726 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Tracking. The links themselves will likely have unique referrer IDs so the platform knows where a click comes from.
Also, they track website visitors without them even clicking the button. Just loading the "share" icon from the social media website allows them to see that you are reading that specific article, and if they recognise your IP or can fingerprint your browser then they can tie it to your social media account (advertising profile).
The buttons aren't necessary for this though. They can do that with a tag, or a hidden 1x1 pixel
Yes, but Facebook can't just place that script on other people's pages.
That's the point of the buttons. Website designers place that shit themselves.
The buttons don't do any tracking just from existing. They only exist to encourage a miniscule number of people to repost your content on social media, and in the event a share comes from that, they may include affiliate info
All the useful information comes from the tracking scripts, which developers are also placing themselves because they are infinitely more useful. They tell you where visitors are coming from, how/if they are converting, everything they are viewing/interacting with on your site, and what the ROI of your ad spend is. In addition to telling you if someone clicked the share button.
Tracking pixels have been decoupled from the "share" buttons for at least 10-15 years
I hear you say that. But umatrix consistently show facebook twitter google and friends failing to load on the majority of pages i visit. Is that something else?
It's Google analytics, and the meta/twitter/etc tracking pixels. Almost every site uses them because they provide useful data to the site owner and they are free.
the images in OPs post appear to be designed to match their site theme, meaning umatrix wouldn't even block them, because they are being served from the sites actual domain/CDN and not from Facebook/Google's tracking domain.
That's not really a thing anymore since the GDPR went into force. These days, websites integrate these buttons directly into the webpage rather than loading them dynamically. The buttons in the screenshot are custom designs, too, so they didn't get loaded from the social media companies.
I use a combination of things like Librewolf, uBlock Origin, and Pihole w/ maintained adlists. I wonder if any or all of that blocks this type of tracking. I know Librewolf has pretty good fingerprinting protections.
https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/
Yes I've run that. It gives a lot of metrics. But I'm specifically wondering which one applies to the example given by the person I replied to.
This ^^
It's also to remind people to post them in social media, clicking them or not.
On mobile, I recommend downloading a URL cleaner to scrape away that shit.
One of my biggest pet peeves is when people share an article and the link is the size of the Magna Carta
Firefox has that built in thank goodness.