this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
146 points (92.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

25040 readers
1154 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

crossposted from irc

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnAustralianPhotographer@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I learned on VIM, but when I found Nano there was no going back.

[–] ztwhixsemhwldvka@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That's like saying you ate sourdough but then discovered wonder bread

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

More like sourdough doesn't go good with everything. Different tastes for different things.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

It's time for you to find Micro. The cycle continues.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

wow, nano is usually everyone's first editor and them moving on to Vim. interesting to invert that. what do you like about nano?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ease of use. When it comes to coding I prefer a GUI as well.

I used Vim when I first installed Linux. It was painful but I used it. I found Nano and I stopped using Vim. No comparison in usability.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

yeah Vim takes a lot of effort to learn. Like any advanced tool. I will 100% always fire up nano when in a hurry. but i like trying to learn Vim as an exercise (in torture? idk haha)

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That depends a lot on when they started.

When I first installed a distribution where the base system only came with nano instead of standard editors, I was very confused (and very disappointed that this whas what they'd come up with as a "friendly" interface).

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

well, like the parent of my comment said, nano is a lot easier to use than vim or emacs. nano is much more like DOS edit or stuff like that. there are many memes about not being able to quit Vim, etc

The main things i learnt from vim are Escape :q and ^Z. Not a dig on vim, but it was quite a learning curve at the time when nano has been good enough for just about everything i do day to day.

[–] vala@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Does nano have LSP support?

Edit: LSP = Language Server Protocol

[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

iirc "lsp" = file extension of lisp

[–] vala@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

LSP = Language Server Protocol

[–] dosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

well, true...i mean both are right in different contexts (like, dos, is it disk operating system, denial of service, a card game or the spanish word for two? depends on context)

[–] vala@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

My point is that when I asked the question:

Does nano have LSP support?

I meant Language Server Protocol.

[–] AnAustralianPhotographer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I dont know what that acronym means. I just use nano as a basic text editor, its automatically showing me different colours XML now. I have used it as a text editor for code before, but if i knew i was going to be coding lots, id look at others like vim and emacs. Me using it is a result of it being the quickest tool to get the job done at the time 'efficiently' and i know there are more powerful ones out there.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If I had to guess they're on about the "language server protocol"

[–] vala@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago