this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
612 points (98.0% liked)

Funny

9020 readers
677 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It’s about men but your takeaway would be that women are smarter because as IQ goes up, Testosterone goes down

[–] drascus@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

this graph very clearly states it's only related to men and has nothing to do with women at all. the only thing it shows is that the majority of men have average intelligence and average testosterone levels. R2=0.19 value means only 19% of the variation in testosterone levels can be explained by IQ, leaving 81% unexplained. This is a very weak relationship, bordering on statistical noise.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder why they chose IQ as the independent variable? Surely it would be the other way around.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The thing about very superficial analysis like this is you can just go fishing for correlations and come back with something meaningless but publishable.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That exploitation of the scientific system is not what's happening here. This is naive maybe, but not malicious, and it seems valid and without unwanted motives.

[–] Bogus007@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Absolutely right. Sorry.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

His takeaway is that women are as smart as men (as in the IQ is the same) but because men have higher testosterone holding them back men are actually smarter than women. What I think he's actually trying to say is that he's a high testosterone misogynist.

[–] Bogus007@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your conclusion is based on deduction which in many occasions - like this one - leads to false conclusions. Try again.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait? So the other person isn't being misogynistic? I'm lost.

[–] Bogus007@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

All in your head, it is. The answer to your question, by you, lies.

[–] drascus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If that is someones takeaway they are wrong. This chart essentially shows that these things are not actually correlated.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Look. I don't make the rules of misogyny. You want things to make sense, you need to look elsewhere.