this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
448 points (98.9% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

4251 readers
1532 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 40 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I mean, that score supposedingly means you struggle to put together normal sentences... So I'd assume it's satire

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

86 is still way above an intellectual disability, that limit is set below 70.

An IQ of 86 is not THAT low, the percentile in the pic is right, about 1 in 6 people is below 86.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 27 points 1 day ago

Oh goodness no, with an IQ of 86, most people wouldn't even peg you as surprisingly stupid, maybe a bit slow. This is still very much in the "slightly below average" column. The 70s are "below average" and only below that do you get into disability territory.

People overestimate the effect a not-even-20-points deviation has in real life. Just like people with an IQ of 114 are a just your average Janes and aren't generally geniuses, people with 86 are still your average Joes and generally not noticeable. 82,2% of all people are between 80 and 120. And you can't tell me that you actually think of every fifth to sixth person around you as exceptional (in either direction).

[–] marte@lemmy.eco.br 11 points 1 day ago

86 is not that noticeable, as others have pointed out. Also, there's a high chance this post was GPT-produced

[–] RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago

Can you really be sure that he actually wrote something himself in 2025? Something that wasn't a prompt?

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Exactly my thinking. Too verbose