this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
209 points (99.1% liked)

Global News

3698 readers
897 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added tothe title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Modelling of how Trump’s tariffs will hit global trade suggests the US will be the biggest loser – while a few nations may emerge as surprising winners.

Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://theconversation.com/new-modelling-reveals-full-impact-of-trumps-liberation-day-tariffs-with-the-us-hit-hardest-253320


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The US is backing itself into a corner .... and when you corner animals, they tend to strike out at things

War is the only industry that American prides itself for the profit and I've got a bad feeling that the only answer the Americans will come up with is to come up with a war of some kind in some part of the globe. A war where they will force themselves to fire up their war machine and force their country to produce stuff because of conflict. Same old tactic as always ... except this time, they will really have to scrape the bottom of the barrel to find a reason to go to war somewhere.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Probably true. It is Trump backing the US into a corner. No other country in backing them there. Americans need to decide, do they get rid of him, or are they willingly sacrificing their family members so he can increase his net wealth (and that of his kids) at average Americans' expense? Unfortunately I expect Americans will be "patriotic" and die to give Trump not only all their money but also their health and lives.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago

We can't get rid of him even if we want to.

He controls every branch of government. The only way to get rid of him right now is through violence. At a time when he is ignoring court orders and deporting people illegally to one of the world's worst prisons. And setting up Guantanamo Bay to house tens of thousands of detainees.

We'll see what happens.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. Hardships won't dissuade Trump supporters, it's just fuel for fascist agendas.

[–] te_abstract_art@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Hmmm things seem to be worse since Trump was elected. Maybe if we go even more right wing, they'll get better?"

MAGA crowds, probably

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Well, I guess the problem is that people believe what he says. He will blame Canada and greenland and Europe. It's nuts but thats where we are.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A war where they will force themselves to fire up their war machine and force their country to produce stuff because of conflict. Same old tactic as always … except this time, they will really have to scrape the bottom of the barrel to find a reason to go to war somewhere.

We've already got the war machine fired up. 20 years in Afghanistan and then straight into Ukraine and Palestine, while sabre-rattling with China to justify more defense spending. Biden increased military spending to an all time high (before counting all the foreign aid), higher than the next 9 countries combined.

Americans love war so much that they hardly need a reason. Every war starts with overwhelming support, with only a few cranks holding out. In time, people sour on the war and start giving up on it, but, like Lucy tempting Charlie Brown with a football, all they have to do it again somewhere else and they'll immediately be all for it.

If they're crazy enough to want it, it'd be trivially easy to start a war with China or Iran (or anywhere else) in a way that nearly everyone would be on board. We're talking about a country where 30% of one party and 19% of the other support bombing Agrabah, a country that doesn't even exist, and 30% still say sending troops into Vietnam was the right decision. Those are people will support any war with anyone regardless of anything, even without propaganda, and propaganda, freshness, and engineering the right circumstances will easily convince the rest to get the levels of support seen at the start of Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, etc.

We're definitely always going to be in a constant state of conflict, like this right now where we have at least three proxy wars going is our "zero point." I just hope it doesn't reach the point of ending the world in nuclear hellfire on the way out.