this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
90 points (94.1% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1641 readers
54 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. β€” Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech β€” You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia β€” (Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism β€” No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion β€” Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Get them to ban your account. Then their users will not be able to see your posts or comments, to reply to. Ironically, the best gift they gave me.

EDIT: Goddamnit! They unbanned me just now.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fair warning: You need to actually be dangerous to their thought bubble to eat a ban. Just insulting them won't suffice, they'll leave that up to make criticism of their position look irate and irrational, what you need to do is to go to asklemmygrad or such and get both up- and downvotes. Make them question.

[–] Draconic_NEO@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You might be able to force them to if you threaten to DMCA them for hosting your own copyrighted content. Posts and comments on Lemmy are technically literature which is copyright protected, and while you give your own instance license to host them via their Terms of service, you don't necessarily give the same permission to remote instances like Hexbear.

That fun little loophole with how federation works, you can explicitly request instances exclude you or it can really suck for them. Lemmy should probably have a built-in option for this to exclude yourself in this manner but don't count on the devs to add it unless people start DMCAing Hexbear and ML to "opt-out" of federation with those servers.

CC: @db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I think the idea that's your content will be rehosted by other servers and you give implicit permissions to do so should he part of your tos

[–] Draconic_NEO@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Maybe, I guess it all depends on whether they agree on how transferable said license is, and whether courts or even just DMCA enforcers at a host or registar will agree with that (DMCA safe-harbor provisions encourage providers to act preemptively rather than duke it out in court else they risk losing protection against liability).

Obviously one's own server's TOS guarantees they have the license to host their users' content, but it might not be as clear for other federated servers, since they have their own TOS that protects them in that event, but if the user didn't sign up there, they aren't agreeing to them, and they could even reject it and still have their content federated there whether they like it or not. Seems like it could potentially be a dicey grey area if they chose to pursue federation as copyright infringement. Especially if they copyrighted their comments and posts officially.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They were really chomping at the bit to ban me for months, because I constantly criticize "left unity" and deny that anarchists can collab with MLs with any systematic significance. (You should see how mald they got at some of my memes. Talking about 1000+ comment pile on!)

As a result, they kept posting "dunks" about our instance in their subs full of bad faith and hypocrisy, which I felt compelled to defend against, but I stuck to the subject at hand, so they had no excuse to ban me. Eventually they just banned me from one of their dunk comms for "liberalism" and deleted all my defenses of our instance that I had been writing for hours. That injustice triggered my ASD and I called that mod a "hypocritical PoS" in one DM, so they finally had an excuse πŸ˜….

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's actually an awesome idea. Not having to deal with another childish ML screaming "anarkiddie" when you point out that China isn't communist. Or the breathless "but-but-but someday they will be!!!!! 1!" Because as we all know, those with power love to give it up.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You misunderstand them. For many such campists. China is already perfectly fine.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Oh no I understand it. And campism is 100% the right word for it. 100% childish and lacking in critical thought. Being a pragmatist I tend to rub ideologues the wrong way regardless. But at least some of them you can understand and respect. Campists should not get any.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I do have to ask, if the admins here are banned from Hexbear, why are we (dbzer0) federated with them?

Not an attempt at a gotcha, I'm just curious why we are.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because I'm not trying to be a BDFL. If people want to defed from hexbear, they can ask for a defed vote.

[–] Emmie@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

You are one whether you want it or not though? You can’t just ask everybody what instance decision to take at every step?

[–] Draconic_NEO@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago

It's an Anarchist instance, they try to be as democratic and community driven as possible. Actually this one here is very similar to that, we have !agora@sh.itjust.works where people can have discussions about things like that and mods may post a vote as well.

dbzer0 is an anarchist instance. They try to avoid any heavy-handed stuff (like defederation) unless the community specifically asks for it.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Of course not, but I work within mandates and can be recalled at any time, which is not how dictators for life work

[–] Emmie@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

How can you be recalled and keep instance functioning? Who elects another instance overseer and is it fair process?

If you really wanted it to be fair then you would have division of power: 1. Intern technician 2. Press 3. Judiciary system. And last but not least Elected overseer -> you

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago

I can be recalled as an admin, but I remain as a sysadmin. I just took a pledge to respect that vote amd ensure the other admins do so as well. The admins select new admins. The community can recall them at any time as well.