this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
358 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

67422 readers
4935 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 34 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You still have to send it somewhere, at home kits are just about collecting the sample not sequencing it.

[–] chonkyninja@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Now imagine, the person you responded to, is allowed to vote.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They didn't say what they were testing for. You can do a binary do you have DNA or not test to see if you are in fact a robot or not. All you need is soap and alcohol.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Drinking soap makes my stomach upset and drinking alcohol makes me upset, that means I'm a human right?

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Any robot I can get drunk with is alright by me

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This thread made me look into the idea of DIYing it, and one of the search results I found looks like it legitimately is about actually doing the sequencing yourself:

https://techcrunch.com/2016/03/30/citizen-scientists-you-can-now-diy-your-own-dna-analysis/

$800 in 2016 was steep enough, but at the $1600 it apparently costs today I'm not sure it's still within the realm of DIY, if it ever really was. I wonder if there are any cheaper competitors?

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That allows visualization of PCRed product, which is a far cry from whole genome sequencing. You can visualize a target at a time with no sequence info. Using it for sequences would be extremely tedious and require a lot of runs.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yup, I used to do PCR genotyping. 50 samples running the same setup would take me a whole 12-hour day at my lower end lab.

I can't imagine having to do 50 different ones with 50 different templates and having to adjust each one. 😅 And that's for 50 sequences. How many are there in a human?

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

About 25,000 coding sequences and a lot more non-coding.