this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
1648 points (97.2% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

10825 readers
2229 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

I used to have my own place before my wife and I got married, and she had her own house too. When I moved in with her I decided to rent out my place to a friend, otherwise I'd have to still pay like $650 a month for my mortgage. I set my friends rent at $900 a month for him and a friend, with cats. I paid my mortgage and had some extra to save up in case a repair was needed. Average rent for an apartment (not a house) was 1200-1500 in the same area. My renters ended up taking better care of the house than I ever did. It was beautiful when they lived there. I ended up making about 5k to 10k extra bucks over the course of a few years and my mortgage was paid for me. Eventually they had to move out due to some issues between the two at which point I sold the house and made over six figures(net profit, not gross), off a house that cost less than $80,000 when I bought it.

See what I did there? I charged a reasonable rent and still made a totally stupid amount of money off of just one property. I wasn't a goddamn parasite who tried to bleed my tenants for everything they were worth.

People like these total shitbags. They're the reason why America's youth have no future

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 hours ago

You made a profit from people who thought they were your friends. Classy.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Using my “friends” to pay off a personal debt while making $250/mo in profit off them. See, it’s possible to be a good landlord, everyone!

Did you share any of what you made from the sale with your “friends” who helped you pay for it and kept it in good condition for you?

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 14 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It seems like it was a situation where everyone felt like they got a good deal and nobody felt taken advantage of. He gave them a better deal than they were going to find anywhere else.

To me, it doesn't sound like he was exploiting his friends.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (11 children)

Did those friends run the risk of having to pay for a new roof or anything else that can go wrong with a house? Tell me you've never owned a house without telling me you've never owned a house

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] objject_not_found@lemm.ee 10 points 22 hours ago

I live in the UK and many neighbours of mine are "professional landlords" and it is so annoying seeing them so relaxed and doing nothing while I am stressed and anxious at my job.

[–] thisfro@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 day ago (5 children)

You still take someone elses money, just less of it.

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

See, when the Landlord charges reasonable rates, and actually provides services in exchange for that rent (helping update appliances to newer, having paperwork on hand for any code/inspections needed for property changes (that the landlord would ultimately benefit from,) and in general treating it as a matter of 'I have obligations' instead of 'I will do nothing but I will absolutely blame the tennants for the inevetable crumbling of the property.'

I dislike the concept at base level, but that is a someone who is trying to not be a scumbag.

[–] thisfro@slrpnk.net 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

The renting part isn't even that bad, the owning part and selling for profit is the problem.

[–] Devanismyname@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago (43 children)

Can we not shit all over normal people for doing normal stuff? This dude doesn't run Blackrock, he had a single rental property.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 7 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Hundred years ago it was normal to beat women of they were out of line. Millenia ago it was normal to own slaves. It's also "normal" for the US Healthcare to screw over people who need Healthcare. Just because something is "normal" doesn't mean it's somehow right. Slavery was normal but then different societies over time understood that slavery is not right and it stopped being normal. Beating women used to be normal but over time we learned that's also not right and it stopped being normal. I don't know about you but I don't think ripping people off is right. However ripping people off has been normalized for capital owners (including land lords).

Nobody should be wishing for his demise (compared to Blackrock and its kin, who I do think should cease to exist), but at the same time he shouldn't be padded on the back for not ripping off his friend as much as he could've. What he did shouldn't be normal.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)
[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a line to draw between exploiting tenants, and compensation for providing dwelling.

You might even argue the OP creates this ambiguity based on interpretation of the wording, or poor communication.

For a productive conversation, let's be crystal clear where that line is drawn.

[–] lakemalcom10@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

This is something I think gets left out, but understandably so when there are so many issues with landlords.

But, as a property owner, you've got all the liability and are responsible for repairs and ensuring that the property is livable and usable. I think there's a level of compensation you can be earning from your time, but I think that having extremely high rent PLUS the ROI of your property increasing in value over time is double dipping. When you consider that your money is invested in property and you're getting value that way, it IS leeching IMO if someone else is doing all the upkeep and paying a premium for that.

Looking at the OP that way shows that those people are just exploiting others. But I do think there is such a thing as ethical landlording. But I think generally we're not there.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not everyone is in a situation where they can or even want to own a house. Renting is much safer in terms of sudden emergencies. Water heater blows out in a house? Fuck you, 3k to replace at least. In an apartment? That's a landlord problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] greenashura@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Someone who needs a place to live in and doesn't have the money or doesn't want to buy their own place. IMO, it is a fair trade as long as the landlord isn't a cunt. The reasons to why they don't have enough to buy their own place have nothing to do with a single landlord, some people don't want to take roots in a single place. If you wanna go to war with someone, go to war with companies, ban companies on owning and renting places, not people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] the_q@lemm.ee 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Your "friend" still paid a substantial portion of your mortgage and gained nothing from it beyond being out of the rain. You used him and paint it as mutually beneficial.

[–] tankfox@midwest.social 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

How is a stable comfortable place to live 'nothing'? If being out of the rain was all it took we'd all live in tents and this conversation would not occur. Owning a house and keeping it repaired/functional is hard and expensive. You don't do your side favors by acting like our boy kept his friend in a locked closet when we all know that isn't true.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 12 points 22 hours ago

I'm not going to argue with you. Shelter is not a commodity.

[–] commander@lemmings.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Why do you get extra properties to rent out to others while he has to pay the rent?

The only reason why he doesn't have enough is because people like you have too much.

We're coming for you.

[–] commander@lemmings.world 1 points 15 hours ago

That's nice, but you shouldn't have an extra property to rent out to others when there's not enough to go around.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

TBH I think you're even overstating how lucrative it is for the average person. Most houses don't double in value, most areas don't rent for $1500 USD, most tenants don't maintain properties well.

load more comments (4 replies)