this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
169 points (93.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

37630 readers
1262 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't understand how they are supposed to "sell your data" if you just never use a Mozilla account and uncheck all the telemetry. Its not like they can secretly steal your data, since its Open Source.

It seems to me like just more FUD that Google is spreading to undermine our trust in free software.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Mozilla is changing the license used for the Firefox executable/binary. The TOS will be the governing license over Firefox, the branded browser executable. It will no longer be open source, as defined by the Open Source Initiative, as users are no longer free to use the software however they want. Firefox will now be source available.

The source code for the browser, is (at least as of this comment) FOSS under the MPL2 license. People are free to recompile the browser under a different name (e.g. Librewolf, Waterfox, etc.).

This is not FUD. I read through the new TOS, Acceptable Use Policy, and Privacy Policy. Since the browser executable was governed under the MPL2, there was little concern from the open source community. I made my judgement from those documents alone.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ughh, don't make me switch my browser again...

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There was a post made my Mozilla years ago (I'm too lazy to find it). It was in the shadow of Chrome getting more scummy. Anyway, paraphrasing horribly, the idea was that the humble web browser was starting to become an increasingly personal decision. It represents you in ways that many people may not fully appreciate, comprehend, or understand. Your browser history tells people what you like, what you are afraid of. Increasingly, it tells corporations and governments who you talk to, where you're going, and what you're up to.

It's why it's important for a browser to be built for people, not for corporations.

It's so sad to see how far Mozilla has gone from that stance.

So I get how challenging and annoying changing a browser is because in many ways, it's you. It's who you are. But, like in life, sometimes we must choose to leave the friends who bring us down. It hurts, it sucks. But it's the way of life.

I've spent a good part of this morning switching things over to Waterfox. It's not perfect. There are gaps and for some reason, I can port over Chrome and Edge profiles but NOT firefox profiles. But sometimes a fresh start is good too.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Subbed! And made the first post!

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Honestly I stay away from Lemmy.ML for obvious reasons (Programming.dev is far nicer)

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because I am but one man. 😂

Waterfox was what I noticed first. If waterfox didn't work out, it's next. Followed by ladybird.

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 1 day ago

I think the painful reality is, is that the availability of good honest, privacy focused browsers are narrowing. Mozilla just had to go and make it harder. I'm personally using LibreWolf myself.

[–] ookiiBoy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

LibreWolf my dude. Everything still works as if in FireFox.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's only works so long as Firefox stays alive and in development.

LibreWolf relies on Firefox being funded, if Firefox dies then LibreWolf also dies. Tens of millions of dollars go into engineering salaries to keep Firefox up-to-date on web standards, features, and performance. LibreWolf benefits from this.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

First, mostly as if in Firefox. Go open Netflix, just for the laugh of it.

Second, a fork that depends on Mozilla's power to develop the upstream is not really in the clear. From a licensing perspective, sure. But let's assume the worst (because it's 2025 after all). Firefox is no longer open source. Sure, we can fork from where they left. But building, maintaining, and evolving a browser engine (and the browser itself) requires substantial work. Which means, developers/maintainers, and money. And staying on a "bare" browser might not be viable as long as standards keeps evolving and 95% of people will not care about that stuff.

All that to say, a fork is an option for now. A more tangible solution for the future is needed. A new "Mozilla" without the $millions CEO and structure, Mozilla splitting Firefox into a clean base and a commercial product, something else. But not a fork that just follow Firefox source.

[–] ookiiBoy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

because it's 2025 after all

😩 Fuck, I know right?

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I found it ironically frustrating that converting from Firefox to LibreWolf is harder than from literally any other browser, because there's no import mechanism.

It wouldn't be that hard to make a standalone tool to import bookmarks, passwords, and config settings, and would make LibreWolf a seamless transition for Firefox users. Instead, it's a frustrating process in re-creating years of tweaks.

[–] ookiiBoy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

It uses the same profiles and configuration as Firefox. Should just have to rename the configuration folder to .librewolf?

[–] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How can Firefox not be open source if its sources are under the MPL2 ?
It has always been the case that Firefox is a trademark and you can't distribute it under that name. However if the code is open source the project is too.

As of today, the latest Firefox Version 135.0.1 Binaries are released under MPL 2, which is open source.

Whenever the terms are implemented, the Terms of Use will replace the MPL for the binaries. Open source has a strict definition and goes beyond source code.

The Terms of Use, as current proposed, would violate #5 ("No discrimination against Persons or Groups") as the TOU allows for Mozilla to terminate your use of Firefox for any reason.

As a result, their binary moves from Open Source via the MPL to Source Available, via a proprietary license.