this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
628 points (99.4% liked)

politics

20478 readers
3216 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a 35-year-old veteran lawmaker, spoke to NPR about her party’s path forward.

She predicts Republicans will face backlash over Medicaid cuts and federal worker firings.

Despite some Democrats suggesting a new immigration approach post-election, she maintains support for a path to citizenship and recently held a know-your-rights seminar that drew threats of investigation from Trump's border czar Tom Homan.

AOC told NPR "everything feels increasingly like a scam" for ordinary Americans while government serves the wealthy well.

Unlike Trump, she opposes drastically cutting government agencies but questions programs like Medicare Advantage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Our gov is taking our tax money and not showing us what they are doing with it. If its not a scam, show us where the money is going.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Our gov is showing us what they do with the tax money. It is, in fact, all public information you can get with a couple seconds of digging (and has been that way for a LONG time).

https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/federal-spending/

The only real black boxes of the government are military and espionage spending. Everything else is out in the open.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That military black box is massive, and the pentagon hasn’t successfully completed one of its past seven audits. This is a prime area for reform and cost cutting, and yet house repugs just voted to add another 100 billion to its budget.

AOC is correct, it’s a grift, and the billionaires and corporations are coming for what little we have left.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

For quick context for why that is. If memory serves right they at least used to slash the budgets of units who didn't use said budget up completely. As you can imagine that results in a shit tonne of wasteful spending for literally no reason, just corpo run it like a shitty business crap

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does this include all the money that the government is giving to Elon Musk??

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Yes. Our government is actually really transparent. Granted, a lot of this wasn't apparent until DOGE claimed to bring transparency, and then everything they did was shown to be redundant or worse with existing systems.

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Even military isn't that opaque. The published numbers are HUGE.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree. But I absolutely do not trust the richest man in the world, who was not elected at all, in charge of those funds. Dude already has been using it to funnel money into his own projects. You’ve handed the keys to your safe to a known burglar, and now you’re offering him blowjobs as well.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Don't forget that he is also firing people who were investigating his companies.

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is a dumb take. It's publicly available information

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

No, I think the dumb thing to do would be to assume that the person who was convicted of 30+ felonies concerning a legal campaign financing is being fully transparent about his intentions and the amount of money he shifted over to the worlds, greatest billionaire(Musk). Also don’t forget that Donald Trump was convicted of a charity scandal and now he can’t run a charity inside the state of New York without court ordered supervision.

Those government reports should be 100% truthful but if you’re willing to believe that they are under Donald Trump, then I have a bridge to sell you .

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Just not the uninformed shoddy lie filled way DOGE are.