this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
385 points (99.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

57360 readers
577 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

256kbps AAC is still proprietary, but you can convert it to an MP3 with something like dBPowerAmp

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) is patented and requires a license for legal use.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I mean so is MP3. If you really want to be a non-proprietary purist you need to rely on Opus for a lossy audio compression, which is not as widely supported in music players as MP3 or AAC.

[–] xep@fedia.io 1 points 4 hours ago

MP3's licenses and patents have expired.

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Don't do this. You will lose quality every time you re-transcode an audio file. AAC is supported by basically everything now.

Also MP3 is a pretty bad format all things considered. The most efficient format is Opus, it's open source and transparent at 160kbps.