this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
222 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19656 readers
3855 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump’s new tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China sparked backlash from business groups, economists, and some Republicans, who warn of rising prices and economic disruption.

The tariffs—25% on Canadian and Mexican imports and 10% on Chinese goods—prompted retaliatory measures from Canada and Mexico.

Critics, including the US Chamber of Commerce, call them a tax on American consumers. Economists estimate a $200 billion hit to the US economy, with inflation rising.

Trump defended the move, even suggesting Canada should become the US’s “51st state.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Its crazy days right now and something crazy just occurred to me.

(conspiracy theory) We all know trump isn't smart enough to come up with any of this on his own and is just following instructions of people close to him who convince him that he's a big boy by putting all these tariffs in place. Is it possible his cronies are intentionally giving him bad advice putting all these tariffs in place alientating him from his opponents and allies alike so they can use the 25th Amendment to declare trump incompetent putting Vance in charge for 4 years? (/conspiracy theory)

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 4 points 7 hours ago

It's far simpler that his handlers are foreign and actors who want the nation destroyed so they can chop it up and auction off the pieces. That motive fits.

His new inner circle are not his handlers; they are new recruits who want to be first in line to buy up the pieces. A billionaire is not a patriot. They don't give two fucks about society - that's why they're billionaires.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

To what end? If what you say is true they should have everything they want with Trump?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Two problems with trump from his handler's perspective.

  1. Sometimes he goes "off script". (injecting bleach really?!) (Sharpie adding a fake hurricane landing path on a nationally televised alert REALLY?!)
  2. He's malleable by his ego. trump used to be easily in Bannon's pocket, now Musk has his ear (and the power that comes along with it). Lots of folks worked hard to get trump in power for their own means. I imagine many are not happy that Musk is using them to get his own way and line his own pockets.

I'm not seriously considering this is true, by the way. Its just a manufactured idea that could fit the puzzle we have today.