this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
973 points (95.3% liked)

News

24273 readers
5398 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Proton Mail, known for its privacy-first email services, faced backlash after CEO Andy Yen praised the Republican Party and its antitrust stance.

The company initially posted and deleted a statement supporting Yen’s comments, later claiming an “internal miscommunication” and reiterating its political neutrality.

Critics question Proton’s impartiality, particularly as it cooperates with Swiss authorities on legal data requests.

Privacy advocates warn that political alignments could undermine trust, especially for Proton’s users—journalists and activists wary of government surveillance under administrations like Trump’s.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I disagree. I for sure will keep using the service, this has nothing to do with it.

I genuinely can't see any issue with his statements, I read them in context and - while I don't have an opinion on the subject - I think they are totally reasonable personal opinions.

Also lumping together "tech CEOs" is another (in my opinion) completely wrong generalization.

  • proton is a company with a healthy business model that doesn't harm users
  • the CEO decided to give control of the company to a nonprofit to ensure the values will be followed with no pressure.
  • the company is not a social media nor a company that controls what you can see, which is a big difference because alignment with one or other political view can have a huge impact in those cases (which is why zuck alignment is a much much bigger deal than Andy Yen supposed alignment).
  • the company is not american, it's not part of big tech.

So yeah, I disagree even with this part of your interpretation of the situation.

I don't think there is any way to find a common ground. Personally I find your interpretation really forced and therefore exaggerated. Context, track record and most importantly the words of this guy do not seem to point out at all to a "mask off situation" in my opinion.

Edit: I really dislike meta-comments. I am commenting based on what interests me, whether other people do other stuff is not something I can do anything about. Please refrain to use the "people like you..." type of statements. You have no idea who I am or what I think besides this conversation.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Then by all means, continue using Proton. But if you can't understand why people are pissed about what Andy Yen, then there is nothing more to say.

The context and the message are pretty simple and clear and you try to make it nuanced for whatever reason. The guy sucked it up to Trump and people told him to get fucked.

CEO all over the world have been fucking people over for a dollar more and it is not hard to see why Andy Yen's message was received as it was.

My interpretation is reading the tweet from Andy Yen as it was written. It wasn't a nuanced position, it wasn't a long text with many points and the context is pretty straightforward. But you try to make it seems like it was an intricate and nuanced position.

The post on Reddit following the backlash is simple damage control 101 as we see every week when a CEO does a dumb thing.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago

But you try to make it seems like it was an intricate and nuanced position.

No, I integrate it with the thoughts he expressed. He didn't back down from his opinion (on reddit), he simply elaborated more. Quite common for a tweet that due to the idiotic limitation on characters is very easy to write in ways that don't fully express what you want to say.

I understand why some people are pissed. But some people see politics in the same way football fans see the sport. So even a tiny, indirect praise for an action that Trump does that might be actually positive (even for the wrong reason) is seen as a capital sin, because you can't be nuanced, you can't have specific opinions, either you are against or you are a supporter, like in football. And I fully, wholeheartedly, disagree with this attitude, at least for external observers (in this case, non US citizens), and especially once the elections are over (my judgment on this tweet would have been different if the election didn't happen yet).