this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
729 points (97.3% liked)

Political Memes

5237 readers
1943 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What does unionizing your building accomplish?

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Collective bargaining, same as any unionization

[–] WorldWideLem@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does a strike work in this case? Stop paying rent?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's correct, but it's not just "stop paying rent", as that's illegal. In general, a tenant union would either facilitate or assist with helping the tenants set up a rent escrow to be released when the problem is solved and the rent strike ends

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What leverage do you have though? You can't go on strike, you're legally obliged to pay the rent you agreed to. You can't withdraw your labour, because you don't do any.

[–] Iampossiblyatwork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You could work with a court and do something like put it in escrow so the court can see you not paying rent isn't just because you can't. Instead it's about withholding money from landlord to begin negotiations. Basically still acting in good faith but also withholding money to give you leverage. IANAL

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Double-check this for your state. For instance, in Ohio if your landlord is not keeping up on their end of maintaining the property you can go to the court and set up an escrow account with them that will hold your rent payments until ALL of the work is completed to YOUR standards, not theirs or the court's, and they are legally barred from taking any action against you for the duration and just about anything they do afterward is immediately suspect of being viewed as "retributive action" which is illegal under the state's renter's rights laws. Always read your rights for your state.

[–] lapommedeterre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure, but it'd be cool for an entire building to withhold rent for building repairs, or repairs for an individual.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can typically do that without a union though.

[–] from_the_black_lagoon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

probably easier with a union. You show the landlord you are well... a union... and in it together

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure if a union is the right term for that, but organising as a group and having a spokesperson is definitely a good idea.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sounds like it might be more like a coop. Alternatively, unionizing for the purpose of sharing information on the landlords' practices, tenants rights, pooling money for legal help, etc.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would think that if all the tenants banded together, they could also negotiate on rent rises. I doubt they could prevent them, but they could certainly threaten to refuse to pay collectively if it was too high. Yes, that risks evicting the whole building, but that seems like a bad risk for the management company to take.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Forming a "union" and not paying rent sounds like a sure fire way to get a whole building evicted.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I said refuse to pay the rent increase. Why would they evict the building over that? Because they don't want any rent at all?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's simply not how this works, if you don't pay your rent, you get evicted. And yes, a landlord likely would evict an entire building full of troublemakers.

The idea is, if you don't like the cost of something, you go somewhere else. Why would rent be any different?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yes, a landlord likely would evict an entire building full of troublemakers.

Do you have an example of a landlord evicting every tenant of a large apartment building because they banded together to oppose a rent increase?

The idea is, if you don’t like the cost of something, you go somewhere else.

Have you not been paying attention? There is nowhere else. Rent is ridiculously high everywhere. You free marketers are not grounded in reality.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have an example of a landlord evicting every tenant of a large apartment building because they banded together to oppose a rent increase?

Has anyone tried this before? this entire premise just isn't realistic, the only leverage you have over a landlord, besides knowing the rules, is taking your business elsewhere, AKA a boycott.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the whole point of unionizing the building. So yes it is realistic and yes it does give you leverage. Do you really think they would evict 50 apartments simultaneously?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you really think they would evict 50 apartments simultaneously?

Yes, yes I do.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would they risk losing all of that income when they would lose a lot less if they just negotiated with the tenants? Sounds like they're really bad at business.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because they could replace them with tenants who will not only pay the new rate, but not be a pain in the ass.

Your hypothetical tenants are not negotiating from a position of strength at all, they can be easily replaced.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They could reach full capacity before they lost enough money to make it not worth it? Where would all of these people willing to pay their higher rates come from?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you not been paying attention? There is nowhere else. Rent is ridiculously high everywhere.

According to you, there is a shortage of rental properties, and no shortage of tenants.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There's a shortage of affordable rental properties. Why are you not aware of this?

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/aug/12/housing-renter-affordable-data-map

[–] isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] iron__giant@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Co-op, as in a cooperative housing ownership

[–] SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Coop, as in a really tight space made of wirefence

[–] iron__giant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

With as small as some of those apartments are, you're probably not too far off

[–] s_s@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago