this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
335 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60631 readers
3465 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This means men will see many fewer women on the platform in many cases.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

it means men would not spend hours on the app, which means nobody would ever do this

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Exactly, Im 50 and Im not rich or particularly good looking. If I was straight I might only see 5 or 6 women on the app that would match with me to begin with and if those didn't become anything I'd be done with that app. It can't work

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Would you rather see 5 or 6 women that all expressed interest in you or a thousand women who have never and probably will never even see you? Open the app, swipe 5 or 6 times, move on with your life.

[–] orgrinrt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Exceptthe company that makes the app needs you to keep dating to make money. If ypu have 5 options and they don't pan out you are done with that app.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

As someone who has spent a stupid amount of time browsing Tinder for shits & giggles, I'm not sure I wouldn't want that. But then again I'm gay and things work way differently for us. If I swipe right, it's very likely we match and then have a boring convo that goes nowhere. Maybe I suck at it but I never have any luck despite everything.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

You're gonna have a boring convo on a chat app with a random stranger. You're both interested in each other, just ask to meet up. Do something interesting together and the conversation will flow naturally.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

i am the most attractive sexy man in my entire giant city of 23 million people but i still have to swipe 50 girls to get 1 match and i might not even be that interested in her. better to meet girls in real life and follow them around on the tube and insert myself into their personal space 🚀

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Who wants men spending hours on the app and why? Most of these are subscription-based, not ad-supported.

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Sure, but you've got to build that habit of checking the app. Gotta lure people back for more little hits of dopamine. The men aren't going to subscribe (or at least stay subscribed) if they aren't getting that illusion of lots of options for people to date.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i dunno i thought that was the goal of all apps. it's free money basically

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No, it's the goal of apps that want to serve as many advertisements as humanly possible. Most dating apps don't have any way to monetize your attention.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, that's the idea. They wouldn't see anyone who hasn't already liked them.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which means after the exhaust those few options they won't use that app again. No app developer will do this.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're not "exhausting options". They're just only seeing the options that are actually available, rather than an endless stream of those that aren't.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You get that not seeing more people is the problem for the developer, right?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If I see five options and then date those five and it goes nowhere if there aren't new potential matches presented regardless of suitability the user will go to a different app where they are given the illusion of more choice.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You think people will be happier to swipe endlessly for hours with extremely limited success than to open their app, look at 5 profiles and instantly find a match?

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Over the long term I know that the app that has many potential matches will always outlast the one that has a handful to single digits.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't seem to understand the concept. There are no "potential matches". If they don't like you, you will never match with them.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

No, you're misding the point. If a menu has ten items on it and you try those ten and none appeal to you then you'll stop going to that restaurant unless they offer you more options. Similarly if the dating app only offers five or six potential matches and those go nowhere you won't use the app for long and the company fails.

Do you think dating apps exist to hook people up in relationships? They can't really make money that way as connected people tend to stop dating.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, this is not that complicated. I don't know what else I can say to help you understand. Have a nice Monday.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Right back at you. I think the confusion is you are thinking of what the user wants and Im talking about what the company running the app needs. They are very different things.