this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
961 points (97.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

6196 readers
2950 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
961
Censorship 😑 (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago (21 children)

Has Lemmy just been completely flooded with CCP apologists now?

RedNote ToS includes provisions that require you to post "correct views on history, nationality, state, or culture".

I guess if you believe Taiwan should be "returned" to the mainland, Uhghurs deserve to be "re-educated" and enslaved, and that China is the natural and rightful pre-eminant global power... you're gonna be fine.

[–] kiagam@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I took it as "don't pretend we don't have censorship too"

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Saying "there is censorship here" in no way implies "there is not censorship there"

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 3 days ago

But wtf? Censorship isn't when someone prevents unhinged personal attacks? Why is "free speech" not the ability to report on corruption, but now about being able to use hate speech and shit? It's never been the case and not hard to differentiate between them

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's false equivalence though, although with the election of shadow president Musk it's getting a bit more hazy.

Even so, one is an (admittedly hugely influential) private company and the other is the actual single-party government dictating what speech is allowed.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

one is an (admittedly hugely influential) private company and the other is the actual single-party government

The US has been governed by public-private partnerships for centuries. Trying to draw a line between the industry administrators that get promoted into every crevice of public sector bureaucracy and the elected politicians who depart office to serve as lobbyists and board members of private firms is a fool's errand.

Do we celebrate Chris Dodd the Senator and denounce Chris Dodd the chairman of and chief lobbyist for the MPAA? Do we applaud Hank Paulson the Treasury Secretary and denounce Hank Paulson the CEO of Goldman Sachs?

Americans seem to have no trouble drawing a straight line between Singapore-incorporated ByteDance and the Chinese Communist Party. Why can't they see the connection between Howard Lutnick or Linda McMahon or Betsy DeVos or Elaine Chao and the businesses they own and operate?

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hey you'll get no argument from me. I'm on Lemmy for a reason. But it's still not the same as just straight up "the government decides what is thoughtcrime"

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

"the government decides what is thoughtcrime"

the owner class decides and they control both the corporation and the state.

You find this arrangement superior to Chinaman daddy model... which is fine, that is your opinion. But at the end of day, there is no much difference beyond who gets oppressed and for what reason.

You are appear to accept economic oppression as preferable because chinaman bad.

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I think I'm about done here. This is why no one likes spaces like Lemmy. The absolutely condescending "Unlike you I understand the world, but you're entitled to your worthless little opinion of course". Holy hell. Not to mention the repeated casual racism which I'm guessing you're trying to project on me? Try to do better dude.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 8 points 3 days ago (13 children)

When all of the companies do it and they do as they are told by daddy Sam... What is the difference.

The only difference I see is that they don't send you to gulag in US unless you really make some dear leader life uncomfortable.

Americans still do a lot of self censorship. Anything Israel related gets modded into shot on normie socials.

Luigi is prolly best example... They are suppressing that across all media, fake news and social... How is this different from shepoohs bullshit?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

brought to you by the same users that made:

  • you're a Nazi because you don't support Palestine
  • Harris is evil, vote 3rd party
  • I'd rather vote for Jill Stein than vote for Trump
  • Harris is just as bad as Trump
  • If you support Harris you want to kill Palestinian babies you Nazi
  • Democrats and Republicans are the same
  • If China is bad, America is worse
  • American censorship is worse than Chinese censorship
  • TikTok was banned because it was a threat to the American surveillance state
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 days ago (8 children)

you’re a Nazi because you don’t support Palestine

Legit. Supporting genocide kinda invalidates your other points.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Okay, but if you recognize genocide in Palestine, that's just a vote for Donald Trump who is a Nazi.

That means recognizing genocide makes you a Nazi. Only by ignoring genocide, shutting up about 3rd parties, admitting China is worse, venerating Democrats as the only good party worthy of your vote, and apologizing for any kind of environmentalism that might cost us the election can you truly stand up for the people of Palestine.

And since Harris didn't win, we know you broke these rules. The only reason you'd do that is if you secretly conspired to hand Donald Trump the election, because you're a Nazi.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lmao yes, have you not been spending much time on here? The second biggest instance is run by tankies

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Let's just say I roll with the stricter, more traditional definition of "tankie" not the current definition which is much closer to "people I disagree with"

Yes, I'll take my downvote now sir.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Then you can go and browse through it and see how their moderators and admins ban and censor people who call out their genocide denial. I'm aware of the euphemism treadmill but I really do mean what I say.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What about your genocide denial?

I'm of the firm belief that everyone denies genocide, they are just selective about which ones they choose to deny and which ones they choose to be Very Very Upset about online.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Uhhh, I don't know what genocides you think I'm in the closet about lol, anyone who thinks Israel hasn't been committing genocide is insane and the US has been disgustingly complicit in it. It's not hard to see

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

anyone who thinks Israel hasn’t been committing genocide is insane

Completely agree 100%

The difference is that while you focus all your outrage on Israel's genocide other genocides, both figuratively and literally, still exist.

Why do you choose to ignore/deny/de-prioritize those ones? Serious question.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Pretty sure Lemmy has always been full of people who support freedom of speech, open internet, internationalism, anti-censorship, etc.

It's got nothing to do with "apologizing" for some state targeted by this wacko genocidal empire.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

Yes, been that way from the start and is made by them.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Mostly no (I hope), we’re just laughing at americans literally not being able to read anything soaked with propaganda and switching from one source to another.

Ccp apologists can suck Winnies dick

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

we’re just laughing at americans literally not being able to read anything soaked with propaganda

All Americans? Everything they read?

load more comments (15 replies)