this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
338 points (88.4% liked)

Political Memes

5248 readers
3629 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's not really capitalism anymore when the government keeps bailing out businesses that are supposed to fail.

[–] TheDankHold@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This happens when capital owners get enough wealth and influence to capture government regulatory agencies. This is what any attempt at capitalism will build to.

At least the no true communism people use the actual definition of the system in their argument. What you’re describing is literally capitalist organizations acting on the incentives inherent to the system.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're being ridiculous. Greed is the "inherent incentive" that leads to regulatory rapture under capitalism and authoritarianism under communism (which one could argue to be the same thing in essence).

The solution is a government of the people, for the people, a.k.a. democracy. Which can choose whichever economic system it damn well pleases, as long as it keeps greed in check through taxation, public services, strong welfare, social discourse, etc. Like social-democratic countries in Europe have been doing for decades. Or try a version of that for communism, I don't care.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even so, those countries in Europe are still capitalist. They've just tempered it with government policies that restrain it to adequate levels.

In that sense I suppose "this is the least worst system" isn't technically true. Unbridled capitalism from the industrial revolution is incredibly different from restrained European capitalism after all.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did not say, nor do I think, that capitalism is "the least worst system". I'm sure we could do better in many regards, but that's quite irrelevant to the point anyway.

America's version of capitalism isn't the only cannon version of capitalism (and I could write a whole-ass essay about how the current state of affairs in the US goes back decades, and is fundamentally unfixable due to the federal nature of the country with its urban/rural divide mixed in with Electoral College and FPTP voting essentially preventing any meaningful structural reform).

There's no need to dismiss neoliberal social-democracy, just because it's "different" from the mess that America got itself into. Europe's achievements stand on their own, and America's systemic failures being blamed on "muh capitalism" completely misses the point, and the actual root cause of the democratic back-sliding which is corrupting the system in favor of the elites.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I completely agree actually. Blaming it on capitalism is reductive and masks the actual root causes, and what sort of solutions we need.

[–] TheDankHold@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

And then when capitalists turn news into an entertainment business you’ll vote for their victory while thinking you’re a populist.

Your solution requires a fair playing field, especially with information and people with wealth and power will work to limit that info. Fox News and it’s ever expanding right wing influence sphere show how much money there is in convincing the average voter to vote to further empower the capital class.

You equate the two but I don’t think you actually understand the fundamental core of these ideas. In capitalism, gathering wealth is the basic core foundation of the system. The hierarchy is spelled out and requires a vast underclass who prop up the lifestyles of those on top with their labor. In communism, the fundamental idea is that hierarchy should be dismantled. The system that was initially labeled communism was described as stateless, classless, and moneyless.

Corrupt individuals can turn literally any government into authoritarianism if given the chance, that’s not inherent to communist ideology. Especially when you consider all the dictators the US has cozied up to for natural resources and such. When billionaires say “we coup who we want” you can’t single communism out for creating authoritarian institutions. It shows a lack of perspective.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol dude, this is what happens to virtually every major system. It's just corruption, plain and simple.

[–] TheDankHold@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Only if you sand off the details. The corruption here is directly incentivized as a way to become more successful in the system. Its incentivized to a much larger degree than any other system based on where power is derived from.

[–] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, ok sure.

[–] seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's how capitalism has always worked in practice, though.

Well it's an interesting idea on paper anyway

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 10 points 1 year ago

Of course it is. Capitalism, especially neoliberal capitalism, needs the state to support it. Without the state, who will arrest people who go against the wishes of capital? If there isn't one already, capital will become the state.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is indeed still capitalism

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, that is corporate socialism.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Socialism is not when the government does things.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its not? Every definition of socialism I've ever heard of is exactly that.

For instance:

"Socialism is, broadly speaking, a political and economic system in which property and the means of production are owned in common, typically controlled by the state or government."

What's your definition?

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is not what those words mean.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago

neoliberal governance is an extension of capitalism, change my mind.

[–] niartenyaw@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it is when the richest people have already paid off the government to bail them out, when the time comes, with our tax dollars.

[–] seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

The system wouldn't work without bailouts. It's a feature, not a bug.