this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
1169 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

5412 readers
2974 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Raz@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (7 children)

My solution: Buy a very large monitor.

Then connect some streaming box to it you can easily replace if/when it gets shitty, instead of having to replace the whole TV.

[–] crashoverride@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fuck you getting a 55 in monitor from?

[–] Raz@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This one for example.

I own an older model version of it from a few years back, combined with a Google TV Chromecast.

Yes, it's more expensive than a midrange TV, but it also lasts me a lot longer and isn't stuffed with ads. If I'm ever sick of Google TV I can try to jailbreak/root it, without the risk of bricking the entire TV, or just replace it.

[–] the_lone_wolf@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Great idea! I know exactly what to buy next + better color accuracy than TV which mostly comes with over saturated color labeled as cinematic mode!

[–] yata@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can also just buy a big tv and use it as a monitor streaming from a box or pc. It is considerably cheaper.

[–] I_am_the_grass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Monitors are significantly more expensive than TVs and have features that TVs don't require.

[–] Raz@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That's true, but I considered it an investment for longer term instead of buying a cheaper midrange TV. With the exception of lacking HDMI 2.1, my 55" monitor has all the modern features, with the bonus of having dual input modes and a displayport.

It's basically what "dumb" TV's used to be, minus the antenna, but that's fine as a cord cutter.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That's the idea but being honest there aren't many nice streaming box. Like there is Roku and the Xiaomi one? What else? Fire TV? Chromecast I do not count because you need to cast to it.

I mean I guess you can setup a PC somehow but....

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a Google Chromecast TV, good enough and cheap.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh so that's like with Google TV / Android TV ui without need of casting and you can install apps?

[–] input@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's decently powerful as to not lag massively and you can disable most but not all of the ads / clutter they bundle with it.

[–] coffee@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Nvidia Shield is amazing.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah that's another one.

[–] yata@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Using a PC is definitely the easiest.

[–] BoneALisa@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would love to if they sold 65" monitors lol

[–] ech@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Be careful with commercial displays. Some are just designed to show static ads or pictures, which means they have a very slow response time or low resolution.

[–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For those prices I'd rather have an OLED with ads.

[–] technicalogical@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I don't know, I'd be fine with a 55 inch 4k ViewSonic display for under $600. The 65 was $850 and $1200 for 75 inches. That seems relatively normal, right?

[–] ech@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Ok. That was always an option.

[–] specfreq@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago
[–] meconium_encomium@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That seems like a very expensive alternative to not giving a smart TV your Wi-Fi password.