this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
109 points (94.3% liked)

politics

19308 readers
2764 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The U.S. added 256,000 jobs in December, lowering the unemployment rate to 4.1%, outperforming expectations and reflecting a resilient labor market as President Biden leaves office.

Despite earlier inflation overshadowing a strong labor recovery post-COVID, hiring remains steady, layoffs subdued, and job openings rising.

Forecasters predict gradual hiring growth in 2025, with small-business optimism and easing Federal Reserve policies driving gains.

Economic indicators, like increased consumer borrowing for auto purchases, suggest mixed but improving confidence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What seems to be weird is that "the market" is reacting to this news as if it is bad. From what I gather, it's because they aren't going to get the cheap money they were hoping for (meaning, slashing interest rates, again) because the Fed isn't likely to race to cut them because of jobs?

So now the Dow and S&P are sharply down today...

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Pretty much yeah. They want there to simultaneously be a healthy and robust economy (to maximize those sales numbers) while also having a terrible labor market to minimize labor costs. Low unemployment means that employees can be picky about job offers, while rampant unemployment means they're more likely to accept extreme low-ball offers. Nevermind that those two are directly linked and it's impossible to achieve both at the same time. Not that the way capitalism is done in the US has ever been sane, logical, or sustainable. Line must go up right?