Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
It's not the people don't think cars are bad for the environment. It's that people consider the nebulous cost to be worth the short-term benefit of actually being able to get places.
I think ~~$1000~~ $600 flat one time is definitely worth being able to get places via escooter. No gas, no insurance, no loans or leases (with the exception of Unagi scooters which are like $80 a month). Oh and riding boosts coordination while also not trapping you in a stressful metal box. One costs way less, is better for your physical and mental health, is easy to park in crowded places, but everyone prefers the opposite lol
If I could ride one without risking my life even more than I already do in a car, I'd love to get to work and back on one of those. But there are no bike paths, sidewalks, or any other scooter friendly options for me.
If you can ride while protected from the local traffic, absolutely consider this option!
Also, this only works in places with mild winters, or in the summer. Those scooters don't work great in the snow.
blankly stares in commuting to an amazon warehouse in a snowy ass mario kart hellscape on a scooter
It really depends on the brand. Same with bikes.
The snow absolutely pelting my face is one of the best things I've ever experienced
While I understand what I think your saying and don't want to be to assumptioius, can you please explain how cars have a 'shorr term" benefit when we are looking at 60% annual possibilities of 10 month droughts annually. That's the end of crops outdoors, likely the end of life outdoors
If you can't drive to work, you won't earn any money and you'll die.
Chosing a safer way to get there is the point. If we got rid of all the traffic lights you'll get to work and not die. More people would die on the way to work, but that's the same concept is it not? Right now we have an "acceptable" death rate from car accidents that's Increasing since about 2008ish. One of the reasons why is that we decided to make vehicles taller and larger for no reason other than to avoid regulations that were set on vehicles for environmental safety.
Basically we said "cars should have higher mileage to minimize damage to the environment" and someone said.. well that's unreasonable for larger vehicles, and then companies started making larger vehicles to fall into a category that would omit them from the higher mpg requirements. Also a 4" higher grill is associated over 20% increase on killing pedestrians.
Example: A 4 door Jeep Cherokee in 1994 was plenty big enough to carry a family of 4 and a load of groceries in the back.
1994 Dimensions: Length: 165.3" Width 70.5" Height: 63.2' Weight: 3,357 pounds
2024 Dimensions: Length: 193.5" Width: 77.5" Height 70.8". Weight: 4,238 pounds
A more efficient engine would fit in the old Jeep.. yet it is now more than 2 foot longer. More than half a foot wider and half a foot taller.
So now you need wider roads to fit wider lanes, and space houses out further to fit these cars as they build new areas. Larger parking lots, meaning more room between businesses, making it all inaccessible more and more, and the only reasonable way to get anywhere is by getting in a car.