this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
586 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19271 readers
2411 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Key leaders of the “Abandon Harris” movement, which encouraged voters to oppose Kamala Harris due to U.S. support for Israel during the Gaza war, are now expressing unease about Trump’s incoming administration.

Many in the movement, including prominent Muslim leaders, voted for Trump hoping he would bring peace to the Middle East.

However, concerns are growing over his Cabinet picks, such as Mike Huckabee and Tulsi Gabbard, which some see as troubling for Muslim communities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So you thought Trump was the better option.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

ah yes, the old, "if you dont do exactly what I say the way I say it then you are basically voting for trump" game. Yeah I dont play those dumb centrist hostage games. Cute.

DNC idiots didnt have to set it up this way but they did. No anger for them eh? Just for the slaves who didnt mind the whip and support the genocide?

Tell. me, when Harris talked proudly about her glock did you go outside and shoot yours in the air? yeeehaw!!

if you dont do exactly what I say the way I say it then you are basically voting for trump

Welcome to a world where FPTP has managed to create a binary choice, and one option is clearly worse. It's not even "do what I say" or "voting for trump", it's failing to oppose him. Everyone that advocated against voting for Harris is complicit in the damage Trump will do that Harris wouldn't have. Trans kids, abused spouses, victims of labour safety violations, all their blood will be on the hands of those that said "I don't care".

Like you.

I dont play those dumb centrist hostage games

So you're going to let the hostages die? How noble and enlightened.

I didn't set it up. I don't agree with all of Harris' views. But the General Election isn't the place to make that point. Local elections, primaries, protests - great! But for all that it sucks, the General Election is a hostage situation. And unfortunately for the hostages, it's not a "game", it's fucking life-or-death and you found "death" acceptable. Their death, namely.

No anger for them eh?

I've been plenty angry at them, as I am at all enablers of this fucked-up dilemma. But I can be mad at multiple people for different reasons.

Just for the slaves who didnt mind the whip and support the genocide?

Right, and who was the anti-genocide candidate?

Oh right. Neither. Because this election wasn't about supporting or opposing genocide.

It was about all the points in which Trump and Harris are different, all the things you don't care about, those "hostages", which you'll gladly let die for the sake of feeling good about doing nothing.

You let people die in the name of pretending to save people. That's the hypocrisy.