this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
230 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

60070 readers
5422 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
230
Bluesky teases paid subscription, Bluesky+, in new mockup (techcrunch.com)
submitted 1 day ago by scsi@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/27733087

Social networking startup and X competitor Bluesky is working on subscriptions. The company first announced plans to develop a new revenue stream based on the subscription model when detailing its $15 million Series A back in October. Now, mockups teasing the upcoming Bluesky subscription, along with a list of possible features, have been published to Bluesky’s GitHub.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] egrets@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)
  • Bluesky+ profile badge
  • Custom app icons
  • Profile customizations
  • Higher video upload limits
  • High quality video resolution
  • Inline post translations (coming soon)
  • Post analytics (coming soon)
  • Bookmark folders (coming soon)

These seem fair ideas? They're not paywalling critical functionality and you can't run a massive social network for free. It's not the same attitude as the wider Fediverse, and I understand why that rubs people the wrong way, but it's hardly outrageous.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't the last stop on the enshitification express.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't enshittification mean that the provider reduces functionality? it seems to me that didn't happen

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

It's refreshing to see them not including "Ad-free" as a feature