this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
577 points (82.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9787 readers
604 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Nope. In New York, the law for vehicular manslaugher/homicide only applies where DUI is involved. Perhaps you are thinking of regular homicide/manslaughter, but those require proving intent -- which as previously stated is hard to do where an automobile is involved.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

From a NY attorney’s site:

A vehicle is considered a “deadly weapon” according to New York law, especially if you use it to intentionally strike a pedestrian. As a result, you might face much more serious charges than assault if you try to hit someone with your car. Theoretically, you could be charged with attempted murder. You might also face charges of assault with a deadly weapon – especially if you strike and injure the intended target.

So again, if he had used a car, the charges would remain the same. It would be murder.

Stop moving the goalposts. Cars have nothing to do with this.

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

especially if you use it to intentionally strike a pedestrian

There's that word again... One might think it's important...

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

So… he accidentally shot an unarmed man in the back?

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago

I think the point is that it's a lot easier to "accidentally" hit someone with a car