Asklemmy

43962 readers

1242 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What do you think got way too much hate than it should've? (kbin.melroy.org)

submitted 12 hours ago by NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

74 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Funko Pops, to me.

I understand that some of them are fairly overpriced, but I also really like them as is. It doesn't work on all characters, but it sometimes work on a lot and there's so much representation and variety that it's good to have a few.

If people want to talk about waste of plastic and vinyl, they should bark at the companies who make teeny tiny figurines that serve no purpose and have so little detail that spending any money on them is a waste.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 26 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Funko Pops

Imo they aren't getting nearly enough of hate they deserve. I'm not against figure collecting in general but FP are the ugliest motherfucking thing i ever seen in this department, for the same amount of resources, labour and energy they could produce something much better. In fact, a consistent long serie of figures faithful to the original (not ultra-deformed) across so many franchises would been great, but alas only thing there is are those unholy abominations.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I also take issue with buying something that does nothing. “Oh I’m going to put this on that shelf and never touch it again”. It screams cash grab. They’re made of brittle plastic so you can’t play with them. And as you say, they’re ugly.

[–] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org -2 points 58 minutes ago

You must hate furniture then. Because, I'd want my bookshelves, nightstands and even my bed to do SOMETHING.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I would argue that collecting things having purely aesthetical value is also legit, though there is an issue about manufactured demand and role of merchandise in popculture, but fair enough.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I see benefits of displaying art made by a person, but I take issue with collecting. It feels like a form of hoarding.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

It definitely can be, for example art is very often hoarded as form of investment, and this can be a much lower-price form of the same, but not necessarily. I would say the more those things price is, the more chance for hoarding.

That is, economically. If you mean hoarding as in psychology probably it's more depending on person, a lot of people i know including me were collecting more or less useless things but nobody i know went into true hoarding problem and most of those people at some point got bored and got rid of their collections. Other than above personal experience, idk.

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

long serie of figures faithful

I hate to be that person, but the singular of "series" is "series". There is no singular called "serie".