this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
694 points (97.8% liked)

Work Reform

9976 readers
64 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

White-collar workers temporarily enjoyed unprecedented power during the pandemic to decide where and how they worked.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think it can be both commercial real estate holdings, seeing what Big Tech and other prominent CEOs are doing and following their lead, and a way to cutt staff without official layoffs. (Since many people will quit rather than RTO since they no longer live close.to the office, or because they are close to retirement, or they take another position that is WFH or hybrid. I day this because those of some of the reasons my coworkers have quit rather than come in 2 or 3 days a week.)

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Very good point about forcing attrition, my only counter argument (for lack of a better word) would be that it's more dangerous than traditional layoffs since you don't get to choose which or exactly how many employees leave, and my guess is that there's reason to believe you'd lose a large number of senior employees who would have an easier time finding a different remote position.

However the benefits of not having to admit to actual layoffs might outweigh these cons for a lot of companies for sure.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

Except that work is more than just tech companies and there are other industries with retention issues and they are still trying to get people back into the office because of coordination and training issues. In some cases, they have been far more aggressive than tech companies in this regard.