this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
771 points (79.9% liked)

Political Memes

5455 readers
2521 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

i can't even guess as to why they went quiet. not one guess at all. we will never know.

edit: well they're not quiet now once they get called out

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

and no matter who was in charge, the US will continue it's legacy of genocide worldwide.

Soo...what was not voting for the less-genocidey candidate supposed to accomplish?

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

You do realize how insane it is that you posted that unironically, right?

[–] chaonaut@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you tell me what my vote for Harris did? I got to vote for "less genocide" and get "more genocide". Clearly, it was very important for Harris to keep out Palestinian- and Arab-Americans in swing states and bring in Republicans. Can you help me understand how that was supposed to win the most important election of all time where Republicans are planning on genociding everyone not them?

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

At least you tried, if you really did vote for Harris. That's more than most vocal "anti-genocide" types did to prevent this.

[–] chaonaut@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I'm sure that will be of great comfort to me watching the Democratic party continue to capitulate to the Right over the next four years.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

A couple of things... First, this is where you are different than them. You will actually feel it when Trump escalates the genocide in Palestine. Those other people that were pushing people to not vote, don't give a shit. That already separates you from those people.

Second, this is just based on my own personal understanding of fascism, and history, but I have a feeling that you are going to be nothing but disappointed with the Democrats moving forward. Because they will be controlled opposition. Assuming they continue to exist at all.

They will exist as props to get nothing done, and become scapegoats for every problem the Republicans cause. So get used to that feeling. We are going to have much bigger things to worry about than political parties (assuming more than one exists).

Third, to answer your original question, Harris had a very thin line to walk with regards to the topic of Israel/Palestine. I'm not sure if you are aware of the extent of the influence that AIPAC and the rest of the Israel lobby has on US politics (every side, does not matter), but it's extreme. Just look at what happened to Ilhan Omar when she dared to mention the $$ involved in their lobby. And it has just gotten worse since then.

If Harris had come out in favor of ending the genocide, AIPAC would have ratfucked her and she would have lost. I think the fact that she signaled support for Muslims a day or two Election Day confirms this. It was the only way she could do it that wouldn't give AIPAC enough time to completely blow up her campaign.

There was nothing she could have done, so she tried not to talk about it.

[–] chaonaut@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I have people that I'm working with on the local scene who could not bring themselves to vote for Harris, even with how awful they knew Trump to be. I was able to vote, but I understand why they could and know that they still get out and do the work

Being disappointed by Democrats is unfortunately nothing new for me. Two decades of it under my belt so far.

Yeah, and what they've been doing to Rashida Tlaib has been sickening me. I have so much respect for what she's been doing, and seeing the Democratic Party trying to villainize her and her constituents has been disheartening.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

More comforting that actively participating in it.

[–] chaonaut@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I'll be sure to remember that when, in the spirit of bipartisanship, Democrats vote to remove my husband's access to HRT or revoke my cousins' citizenship because one of their parents was an Arab immigrant.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Whats your point? You would have felt better doing nothing at all? Guess we should all just sit down and give up because we got fucked over.

[–] chaonaut@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Nah, I've been doing local organizing and worrying about more than just the top of the ticket, and even past the elections. I supported the Uncommitted movement and was hoping that Harris would actually capitalize on the moment she had when she took over, and, yeah, I cast my vote for her for all the good it did. It's fucking sicking seeing so many sneer at the movement, and pat themselves on the back for having the moral superiority for voting for "the right person" while making so little of what is supposed to make them the right person happen. Being so unconcerned that the person they are so self congratulatory about was saying they would do the awful things and work with the awful people they've been saying are the greater of the two evils.

Genuinely, why did the Democrats go so hard on the anti-immigration policy and cozy up with Liz "I am strongly pro-life and I am not pro-gay marriage" Cheney? How were they expecting to sell people on the lesser of two evils when they were trying to become what they thought "moderate Republicans" would vote for? I've done this song and dance with the Dems for two decades now. I know they don't value me, because they know I don't have another option in the race, but how am I supposed to be excited myself, let alone campaign at others and get them excited for another round of getting sold out?

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The problem with Democrats is that they see someone as evil as Trump, and their response isn't, "damn, that is an evil man. We should put that man in prison." Their reaction is, "damn. Look how evil that man is. Wait, this means we can get away with being incredibly evil ourselves! As long as we are slightly less corrupt and evil than him, we can shame people into voting for us!"

They viewed Trump as an excuse for their own misbehavior rather more than anything else.

[–] chaonaut@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

That hasn't been my experience of Democrats so much as them using "at least we aren't as bad a the Republicans" as justification for not pushing to stop harm, holding to the status quo as hard as they can and "courageously" voting with the Republicans to "save" something while dismantling something else. It seems like the lionizing of mediocrity.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

People want a candidate they want to vote for instead of voting against the other candidate. You can justify to yourself as much as you want that people should have voted blue, but it won't get them to next election. If you actually care, you should be mobilizing an alternative to the dems or pushing them to adopt policies people actually want.