this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
281 points (93.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

32483 readers
356 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's nice that this exists these days, but my god is it horrendously unreadable at a glance

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It makes it look like they're just adding random noise to avoid colliding with existing syntax. Maybe they can try a UUID next time...

[–] flying_gel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It makes perfect sense actually. I did write another comment here if you are interested.

This is how operator overloads were written going back to the initial version of C++ back in 1985. The only new thing is that we can now add = default to get the compiler to generate a default implementation that compares all the member variables for you.