this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
112 points (98.3% liked)
Asklemmy
44152 readers
1157 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No longer letting my family member rants about [insert today's Russian propaganda] go unchallenged.
On the weather front (lol) one of project 2025s goals is to break up the NOAA. They want to do it specifically to hamper the ability for anyone to show the ongoing effects of climate change. If anyone thinks this is a conspiracy theory, it's an actual conspiracy, and here is the direct quote from project 2025.
Stop weather data collection in one part of the planet. That'll stop the global warming believers. /s
Crops grow faster if you decree the weather is perfect. The best weather.
Weather is global, so agencies like the NOAA collect data from satellites, weather balloons, weather stations, buoys, etc. all over the world. NOAA's data is a bit like GPS: paid for by US taxpayers, but used for the common good across the globe. Shutting them down wouldn't just hurt weather prediction in the US, it would hurt everyone. Other developed countries can absolutely predict their own weather, but if they can't include the volume of data generated by the US, their accuracy will suffer (and obviously likewise if the US couldn't use EU data or whatever).
Pilot here. You want to know how important weather data is for safe air travel?
It's yes% important.
I do like the the moon landing one since I always say the government payed Stanley Kubrick to film the moon landing but he demanded to shoot on location.
I always say the moon landings were faked dozens if not hundreds of times and only done for real a half dozen times.