this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
552 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19098 readers
4255 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Harris only received five percent of Republican votes — less than the six percent Joe Biden won in 2020 when he beat Trump, as well as the seven percent won by Hillary Clinton in 2016 when she lost to him. While Harris won independents and moderates, she did so by smaller margins than Biden did in 2020.

Meanwhile, Harris lost households earning under $100,000, while Democratic turnout collapsed. Votes are still being counted, but Harris is on pace to underperform Biden’s 2020 totals by millions of votes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Why do people keep saying Democrats. These were not Democrats. They were political apathetics who were so dumb they didn't see a difference between an existential threat to America, convicted felon, and pathological liar... And a woman with a clean record.

No actual Democrat gave up voting for Harris because of the obvious reach to Republicans who saw that existential threat.

They gave up because of disinformation silos and the economy, stupid

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

a woman with a clean record

People died in her prisons and she kept some after their term so she could use them as slave labor to put out wildfires

and she supported genocide while promising it would continue under her, not for nothing

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Lmfao.

Talk about pure bullshit. People die in every prison everywhere. Maybe you should take a step back in time and look who drafted those laws in the first place.

Well have fun with the 100% support of genocide with Trump, buddy. I'm sure they'll treat your little protests with kid gloves lol. While she was seeking a permanent ceasefire, Trump was undermining it and telling Bibi to finish the job hahah.

That's not to mention what blood is on one's hands for Ukraine, too.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Why are you speaking like you're upset with the outcome of the election if you're a republican?

I’m sure they’ll treat your little protests with kid gloves lol.

Another 'liberal' takes their mask off

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

lol nah man, I'm sure Palestinians will be much better off under Trump and far more amicable to protesters than Harris would've been... Totally ;)

Pat yourself on the back for this MuH BoTh SiDeS narrative!

See you in 4 years when you emptily vote for Jill Stein again.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

No one looks as happy about the outcome of the election as you

Glad you're having fun scolding the people you told to shut the fuck up for the last 4 years for not doing as they're told

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 42 minutes ago

Really. You think I'm happy about this? That the Both Sides crowd can't understand basic mathematics and spoiler effect, or zero-sum logic?

As far as I'm concerned I'm far more distraught and less willing to throw away civilian lives in Gaza and Ukraine than the likes of you. There's a lot of naivety going around thinking that things can't possibly get worse in both of these places for civilians.

Let's see how that logic plays out.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 18 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Is this intended to be a parody of a No True Scotsman?

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Voting Democrat temporarily does not make you a Democrat no differently than Liz Cheney voting for Harris or the first-time low-propensity voter who thinks "they're all the same, but since covid impacted me I'm getting rid of the current guy." People just voted against Trump more than they were voting for Biden or his policies. They just wanted him out and to try something different purely because of covid.

This time around, those people just said, "Both Sides." And sat out. Presumably because they drank the Russian Kool-Aid and live in media silos.

That said, I misread the title and paragraph not referencing Democrat, but Democratic support, so my mistake.

[–] VubDapple@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Cool-aide, silos and two parties who both neglected the little guy given that their wealthy backers can't stomach doing so. Yes the Democrats ignore them less (Joe Biden's effort to forgive student loans) but it wasn't enough, and Trump says what desperate people want to hear I guess.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago

Trump gives his little guys entertainment and the promise to hurt the types of people they don't like. His little guys are well-accounted for, just not in a way that would ever make them not stuck at the bottom. Their propaganda has made them think the problems in their lives are trans minority immigrants rather than the boss that hasn't given them a pay raise in three years because "times are tight".

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You had it right the first time, people voted for change in 2020, and they did it again this time. Same same.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

It's more accurate to say Trump's base cult voted like a cult and will always vote for him no matter. This evidenced by the fact that Trump may or may not even break his 2020 numbers despite even population growth.

It's not just that these people voted for change as in all those millions who voted for Biden in 2020 voted for Trump; they just didn't vote for anything at all.